Constructing a premeasure on half open intervals

  • Thread starter Thread starter c4rpe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    intervals
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on constructing a premeasure on half-open intervals within the set of extended real numbers. The original poster seeks clarity in demonstrating the steps of this construction. There is a request for assistance in understanding the concept of a premeasure. Participants emphasize the importance of clearly outlining the construction process. The conversation aims to provide guidance on effectively presenting the steps involved in this mathematical task.
c4rpe
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I want to construct a premeasure on half open intervals in the set of extended real numbers and showing
the steps of construction clearly.
I know what is premeasure and half open interval of course, but I have problems with showing my steps clearly. Please help
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
any idea?
 
What do you mean with a premeasure?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top