Contact Mechanics: Deformation of a ball on a surface

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the contact mechanics of a solid ball with radius R, density ρ, and Young’s modulus Y resting on a hard surface, leading to deformation characterized by a contact radius r. Participants clarify that at heights greater than r, the pressure diminishes due to the distribution of force over a larger area, specifically noting that stress is significantly less at these heights. The equation for strain, represented as ##\frac {\delta} {r} \sim \frac {r} {R}##, is derived from the relationship between deformation and the dimensions of the ball, with the total compression approximated by ##\delta=R-\sqrt{R^2-r^2}##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Young’s modulus and its application in material deformation
  • Familiarity with basic principles of stress and strain in solid mechanics
  • Knowledge of geometric relationships in three-dimensional shapes
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions involving square roots and ratios
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of stress and strain equations in solid mechanics
  • Explore the implications of Young’s modulus on material behavior under load
  • Investigate the geometric properties of spheres and their deformation under pressure
  • Learn about the application of contact mechanics in engineering and materials science
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, materials scientists, and students studying solid mechanics who are interested in the principles of deformation and stress distribution in materials under load.

phantomvommand
Messages
287
Reaction score
39
Homework Statement
See picture below
Relevant Equations
Y = Stress / Strain
A solid ball of radius R, density ρ, and Young’s modulus Y rests on a hard table. Because of its weight, it deforms slightly, so that the area in contact with the table is a circle of radius r. Estimate r, assuming that it is much smaller than R.
Screenshot 2024-06-03 at 1.35.49 AM.png


Screenshot 2024-06-03 at 1.36.19 AM.png

Screenshot 2024-06-03 at 1.36.41 AM.png


I have no issues understanding the estimation of stress, but the estimation of strain greatly confuses me.

1. How did the author know that "at heights greater than r, the pressure will be smaller"? Isn't r a horizontal quantity? What does it have to do with heights?

2. "Since stress is proportional to strain, that means that the part of the ball that is significantly strained has height r." Again, how does this have anything to do with r, given that r is a horizontal quantity and that the strain is vertical (ish).

3. Even if assuming that the previous 2 claims are true, how was the equation ##\frac {\delta} {r} \sim \frac {r} {R}## obtained?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phantomvommand said:
1. How did the author know that "at heights greater than r, the pressure will be smaller"? Isn't r a horizontal quantity? What does it have to do with heights?
At height r above the flat base, the radius is ##\sqrt{2r\sqrt{R^2-r^2}}## (check my algebra). If r<<R that's about ##\sqrt{2Rr}##. The author is taking that as constituting a value significantly greater than r.
phantomvommand said:
3. Even if assuming that the previous 2 claims are true, how was the equation ##\frac {\delta} {r} \sim \frac {r} {R}## obtained?
In the diagram, the total extent of compression is ##\delta=R-\sqrt{R^2-r^2}\approx \frac{r^2}{2R}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phantomvommand
haruspex said:
At height r above the flat base, the radius is ##\sqrt{2r\sqrt{R^2-r^2}}## (check my algebra). If r<<R that's about ##\sqrt{2Rr}##. The author is taking that as constituting a value significantly greater than r.

In the diagram, the total extent of compression is ##\delta=R-\sqrt{R^2-r^2}\approx \frac{r^2}{2R}##.
But how does ##\sqrt {2Rr} >> r## mean that pressures at heights above r will be smaller?

Sorry, I wasnt clear about my final question. It should be why ##strain \sim \frac {\delta} {r}##. But I suppose if the claim that pressures above r are substantially smaller, then r will be the effective length used in calculation of strain, instead of the more obvious R?
 
phantomvommand said:
But how does ##\sqrt {2Rr} >> r## mean that pressures at heights above r will be smaller?
It is not that there is anything magic about the height being less than or more than r.
At the base, the force is spread over area ##\pi r^2##. At height r it is spread over ##2\pi Rr##. If R>>r then ##Rr>>r^2##. Therefore the stress is significantly less by the time you get to that height.
phantomvommand said:
Sorry, I wasnt clear about my final question. It should be why ##strain \sim \frac {\delta} {r}##. But I suppose if the claim that pressures above r are substantially smaller, then r will be the effective length used in calculation of strain, instead of the more obvious R?
Yes, that is the reasoning.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phantomvommand

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K