Continuity, but is it limits or delta-epsilon or neighborhood?

  • Thread starter Thread starter filter54321
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuity Limits
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the continuity of the piecewise function defined as f: {0} U {1/N} → R, where f(x) = 1/(x^2-x) with f(0)=f(1)=1. The user expresses confusion regarding the application of limit-based and delta-epsilon continuity methods due to the function's discrete domain. It is concluded that the function is not continuous at any point, particularly at x=0 and x=1/N, as these points do not satisfy the continuity definition. The user emphasizes the importance of understanding the definition of continuity in relation to the function's domain.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of piecewise functions
  • Familiarity with limit-based continuity
  • Knowledge of delta-epsilon definitions of continuity
  • Basic concepts of real analysis and function domains
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definition of continuity in discrete domains
  • Learn about the implications of asymptotes on function continuity
  • Explore examples of piecewise functions and their continuity
  • Investigate the role of limits in determining continuity at specific points
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone studying real analysis, particularly those focusing on continuity and piecewise functions.

filter54321
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
EDIT: My presentation of this was pretty bad so I'm trying again.

FIND ALL POINTS OF DISCONTINUITY (IF ANY)

f: {0}U{1/N} --> R
Where N is a natural number

Defined piecewise:
f(x) = 1/(x^2-x)
f(0)=f(1)=1

I'm scared of this problem. Obviously, the function blows up with asymptotes at x=0,1 so plugging the holes piecewise with f(0)=f(1)=1 doesn't help with continuity.

Last semester we covered limit-based continuity and delta-epsilon continuity. However, every single problem went from the real line to the real line. I don't see how you can do continuity with any of the three methods because of the discrete domain. The function doesn't have domain points to generate any of the range points that I want to be less than epsilon close.

The graph of the function is going to be scatter-shot across R2 where every point is floating on its own...I can only concluded that the function isn't continuous ANYWHERE. How do you tackle this one?

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The definition of continuity hasn't changed for this smaller domain space; you just need to pay closer attention to the exact words.

Let [tex]A\subset\mathbb{R}[/tex]. Then [tex]f: A \to \mathbb{R}[/tex] is continuous at [tex]a \in A[/tex] if, for every [tex]\varepsilon > 0[/tex], there exists [tex]\delta > 0[/tex] such that, whenever [tex]x \in A[/tex] satisfies [tex]|x - a| < \delta[/tex], then [tex]|f(x) - f(a)| < \varepsilon[/tex].

To give an example: the function [tex]\iota: \mathbb{Q} \to \mathbb{R}[/tex] defined by [tex]\iota(x) = x[/tex] is continuous at every point of its domain [tex]\mathbb{Q}[/tex].

You cannot speak of a function being continuous or discontinuous at a point where it's not defined, so in your case, you only have to answer whether the points [tex]0[/tex] and [tex]1/n[/tex] are points of continuity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K