1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Continuity of Dirichlet looking function

  1. Oct 2, 2007 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    Where is the function f(x) continuous?

    f(x) =
    x, if x is rational

    0, if x is irrational

    2. Relevant equations



    3. The attempt at a solution

    Is this correct?: I approach some c =/= 0, 1st through x's that are rational
    and prove there is the limit c, and then approach through x's that are irrational and prove that the limit now cannot be c, that now I can conclude that the limit at c does not exist, and hence the function is not continuous at any c=/=0?

    If no, why, and in what other way must I solve it then? If yes, plz try to explain as rigourously as you can why this can be done. Remind you though, don't get technical above 2nd year in which I am. Thank you.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 2, 2007 #2

    Dick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    You have it right. If you approach through irrationals, the limit is always zero. Which is not equal to c unless c=0. There's not really much to get technical about beyond the statement that both the rationals and irrationals are dense in R.
     
  4. Oct 2, 2007 #3
    Well you just did! Sorry, but by dense you mean that: for any pair of irrationals there is a rational between them, and the same the other way? This is what I vaguely remember I read some day on the web. How is it that dense implies you can do that? Thanks again.
     
  5. Oct 2, 2007 #4

    Dick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    A set S is dense if for any x you can find an s in S that is as close to x as you want. Which would let you say for any x you can find a sequence of rationals approaching it and a sequence of irrationals. Do you think you are expected to prove that?
     
  6. Oct 2, 2007 #5
    No way! But how is it that the rationals and irrational are proven to be dense?
     
  7. Oct 2, 2007 #6
    just basically showing that the limit as s in S approaches x is x itself, and that's it?
     
  8. Oct 2, 2007 #7

    Dick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    The proof depends on how you define an irrational number and can be sort of 'technical'. But try this, if x is rational, then {x+sqrt(2)/n} is a sequence of irrationals approaching x. If you think of an irrational in terms of it's decimal expansion then for example sqrt(2) is the limit of the sequence 1,1.4,1.41,1.414,... Each term in the series adds one more decimal place to the expansion and each term in the series is rational. How's that for 2nd year level?
     
  9. Oct 2, 2007 #8
    Sweet! :) Even my neighbor can get that. I'll go there now and show it to him (joking). Thanks so much.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Continuity of Dirichlet looking function
Loading...