Continuity Problem: Show f is Continuous at a

  • Thread starter Thread starter e(ho0n3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuity
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves showing that a function f, defined by the equation f(x + y) = f(x) + f(y) and known to be continuous at 0, is also continuous at a specific point a. The discussion revolves around the implications of continuity and the properties of the function.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of continuity at 0 and how it relates to continuity at other points. There are attempts to apply the Triangle Inequality and to manipulate expressions involving f(x) and f(a). Some participants question the validity of certain implications and suggest alternative approaches, such as replacing variables.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and corrections to each other's reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the implications of continuity and the use of specific mathematical properties. There is a recognition of the need for careful reasoning in proving continuity at a.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that proving continuity at a may depend on the specific value of f(a) and that assumptions about the function's behavior at different points are under examination.

e(ho0n3
Messages
1,349
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Suppose f(x + y) = f(x) + f(y) and f is continuous at 0. Show that f is continuous at a.

The attempt at a solution
Since f is continuous at 0, for any e > 0 there is a d > 0 such that |f(x) - f(0)| < e for all x with |x - a| < d. Writing 0 as -a + a, |f(x) - f(0)| = |f(x) - f(-a) - f(a)|. By the Triangle Inequality, |f(x) - f(a)| - |f(-a)| ≤ |f(x) - f(-a) - f(a)| so |f(x) - f(a)| < e + |f(-a)|. This is as far as I've gotten. Am I proceeding the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First note that f(x + y) = f(x) + f(y) implies f(0)=0, because f(0)=f(0+0)=f(0)+f(0), hence f(0)=0.

So the statement of continuity at 0 reads, "for any e > 0 there is a d > 0 such that |f(x)| < e for all x with |x| < d".

This said, do you see more easily now why continuity at 0 implies continuity everywhere?
 
Nice tip. I think I got it now: Given an e > 0, I need to find a d > 0 such that |f(x) - f(a)| < e for all x with |x - a| < d. Using the Triangle Inequality, |f(x) - f(a)| ≤ |f(x)| + |f(a)| so it suffices to find a d such that |f(x)| + |f(a)| < e for all x with |x - a| < d. |f(x)| + |f(a)| < e is equivalent to |f(x)| < e - f(a). Since f is continuous at 0, there is definitely a d that will satisfy |f(x)| < e - f(a) for all x with |x - a| < d. Thus, f is continuous at a. This completes the proof. Right?
 
Noooo. If |f(x)-f(a)|<e and |f(x)-f(a)|<|f(x)|+|f(a)| does NOT IMPLY that |f(x)|+|f(a)|<e. At all. Not even a little. Just take quasar987's hint and replace x with x-a.
 
Perhaps you misunderstood me. I was trying to convey that |f(x)| + |f(a)| < e and |f(x) - f(a)| ≤ |f(x)| + |f(a)| implies that |f(x) - f(a)| < e.

I never thought of replacing x with x - a. That's a lot simpler than what I was trying to do.
 
e(ho0n3 said:
Perhaps you misunderstood me. I was trying to convey that |f(x)| + |f(a)| < e and |f(x) - f(a)| ≤ |f(x)| + |f(a)| implies that |f(x) - f(a)| < e.

I never thought of replacing x with x - a. That's a lot simpler than what I was trying to do.

That implication is at least true, but it's not of much help proving the limit. Take an example of f(x)=x and say, a=3. The values of e you really care about are very close to zero. If x is close to 3, then |f(x)|+|f(a)| is around 6. Having |f(x)-f(a)|<6 is not going to be very useful as e gets small.
 
|f(x)|+|f(a)| can not be arbitrarily small except when |f(a)|=0 . Hence trying to prove "|f(x)| + |f(a)| < e" will fail unless you can show that f(a)=0 for any given a, but this is not the case
 
I understand now. Thanks guys.
 
Now that I've written things down, I'm noticing that replacing x with x - a is not enough for f(x - a) ≠ f(x) - f(a). Is there some way of proving that f(-a) = -f(a)?
 
  • #10
Nevermind: 0 = f(0) = f(a - a) = f(a) + f(-a). Adding -f(a) to both sides yields that -f(a) = f(-a).
 
  • #11
Sure. You've got it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K