Continuous expansion is surjective

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that a continuous function \( f: X \to X \) defined on a compact metric space \( (X, d) \) is a surjection, given the condition \( d(f(x), f(y)) \geq d(x, y) \) for all \( x, y \in X \). Participants explore the implications of the function not being a surjection and highlight contradictions arising from the properties of compactness and continuity. A critical point raised is the distinction between surjective and injective functions, emphasizing that the proof must rigorously address these definitions to avoid confusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of compact metric spaces
  • Knowledge of continuous functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concepts of surjection and injection
  • Basic principles of metric space topology
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of compact metric spaces in detail
  • Learn about the implications of continuity in metric spaces
  • Review the definitions and differences between surjective and injective functions
  • Explore examples of continuous functions and their mappings in compact spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying topology, and anyone interested in the properties of continuous functions in metric spaces will benefit from this discussion.

boboYO
Messages
106
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(X,d) a compact metric space, f:X->X cts fn, with
d(f(x),f(y)) >= d(x,y)
for all x, y in X Prove that f is a surjection.

The Attempt at a Solution



Let K be the set of points that are not in f(X). It is a union of open balls because X is closed and hence so is f(X).

Choose a finite open covering of f(X)\K with all the open sets having small radius, call this covering G. Take the pre-image of all these sets, the result will be open balls of smaller or equal radius to the originals, and the centres will be closer to each other. call this set of preimages, H.

--

Intuitively it seems like H doesn't cover X and so we have a contradiction (right?), but I don't know how to rigorize it. Hints? Am I on the right track? Missing something obvious?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, I think you are "missing something obvious"! I don't see why you need "compact" or even "continuous". Suppose f were not a surjection. Then there exist [itex]x\ne y[/itex] such that f(x)= f(y). So d(f(x),f(y))= 0. That contradicts "d(f(x),f(y))> d(x,y)" doesn't it?
 
I don't think that's true, let X=[0,1] on the real line and f(x)=x/2. This isn't a surjection but there is no x,y such that: [tex]x \neq y[/tex] and f(x)=f(y). I think you confused surjection and injection ;p
 

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K