Continuous function / epsilon-delta

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving the existence of a delta (\(\delta\)) for a continuous function \(h\) such that \(h(x) > 0\) when \(x\) is sufficiently close to a point \(a\) where \(h(a) > 0\). The context is centered around the concepts of continuity and the epsilon-delta definition of limits.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss starting with the definition of continuity and the intermediate value theorem. There are attempts to formalize the proof using specific values for epsilon, and some participants express uncertainty about how to structure the proof formally.

Discussion Status

Some participants suggest that the continuity of the function implies the existence of a delta that maintains positivity for \(h(x)\) near \(a\). Others are exploring how to articulate this in a formal proof, indicating a productive exchange of ideas without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of formal proof requirements and the definitions of continuity and limits, with some expressing confusion about how to transition from intuitive understanding to formal writing.

zeebo17
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let h: \Re \rightarrow \Re be a continuous function such that h(a)>0 for some a \in \Re. Prove that there exists a \delta >0 such that h(x)>0 provided that |x-a|< \delta.


Homework Equations



Continuity of h means that there exists and \epsilon >0 such that |h(x)-h(a)| < \epsilon provided that |x-a| < \delta

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried starting with the definition of continuity and perhaps the intermediate value theorem, but I haven't been able to get started.

Any suggestions on how to get started?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
so because of the continuity of your function you know that there exists a delta greater than zero that will satisfy this. h(x) is greater than zero because you know that h(a) is greater than zero and if x is close to a the function has to stay positive. if it jumped around then it wouldn't be continuous.
 
Yes, that makes sense intuitively. I'm still unsure how to start writing a formal proof though.
 
In the definition of "limit", let [math]\epsilon= \frac{h(a)}{2}[/itex].
 
Ok, Would this work:

If h(x)> h(a) then h(x)>0 since h(x)>h(a)>0.

If h(x)<h(a) then h(a)-h(x) > 0. Then because h is a continuous function there exists a \delta&gt;0 such that |x-a|&lt; \delta implies that |h(x)-h(a)|&lt; \epsilon. In this case h(a)-h(x) > 0, so 0 &lt; h(a)-h(x) &lt; \epsilon.

If \epsilon = \frac{h(a)}{2} then
0&lt; h(a)-h(x)&lt; \epsilon
0&lt; h(a)-h(x)&lt; \frac{h(a)}{2}
0&lt; \frac{h(a)}{2}&lt; h(x)
and therefore h(x) is greater then zero.
 

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K