Continuous functions in metric spaces

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the continuity of a function f: X → Y between metric spaces (X, ρ) and (Y, θ) using a modified metric space (X, ρ̄). The user seeks guidance on finding a suitable ψ(ε) to establish that if ρ̄(x, a) < ψ(ε), then θ(f(x), f(a)) < ε, given that f is already continuous with respect to ρ. The key transformation involves relating ρ̄ to ρ through the inequality ρ̄(x, a) < ψ(ε) if and only if ρ(x, a) < ψ(ε)/(1 - ψ(ε)). The discussion emphasizes the importance of choosing ψ(ε) such that this relationship holds true in conjunction with the existing continuity condition. The thread concludes with a focus on the algebraic manipulation needed to achieve the proof of continuity.
boneill3
Messages
126
Reaction score
0
Hi guy's I know this is more of a homework question, I posted a similar thread earlier on but I think I ended up confusing myself.

I need to show that a function is continuous between metric spaces. I'll post the question and what I've done any tips on moving forward would be great.

I have any metric spaces
(X,\rho)
and
(Y, \theta)

And a metric space
(X,\bar\rho)
where
<br /> \bar\rho:X \times X \Rightarrow R_{0}^{+}, (x,y) \Rightarrow \frac{\rho(x,y)}{1+\rho(x,y)}.<br />

I have got to show the following

Let (Y, \theta)
be a metric space.
Prove that.
f : X \rightarrow Y
is continuous with respect to \bar\rho if and only if it is continuous with respect to \rho


I have been given that f : X \rightarrow Y
is continuous with respect to (X,\rho)

So I know that for some \delta and \epsilon &gt; 0

that
{\rho}(z,b) &lt; \delta \rightarrow \theta(f(z),f(b)) &lt; \epsilon

I need to show that for some\psi &gt; 0 that

{\bar\rho}(x,a)&lt;\psi \rightarrow \theta(f(x),f(a)) &lt;\epsilon

Can some one please show me how to go about finding \psi ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fix a in X. To show continuity at a, given \epsilon&gt;0, you need to find a number \psi(\epsilon)&gt;0 such that

{\bar\rho}(x,a)=\frac{\rho(x,a)}{1+\rho(x,a)}&lt;\psi(\epsilon) \Rightarrow \theta(f(x),f(a)) &lt;\epsilon

knowing that there exists a number \delta(\epsilon)&gt;0 such that

{\rho}(x,a) &lt; \delta(\epsilon) \Rightarrow \theta(f(x),f(a)) &lt; \epsilon

Notice that, just by algebra, we have that

\frac{\rho(x,a)}{1+\rho(x,a)}&lt;\psi (\epsilon)\Leftrightarrow \rho(x,a)&lt;\frac{\psi(\epsilon)}{1-\psi (\epsilon)}

So, surely, if you can chose \psi(\epsilon) such that

\frac{\psi(\epsilon)}{1-\psi (\epsilon)}&lt;\delta(\epsilon)

then you will have won, yes?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
554
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K