Continuous Functions - Thomae's Function ....

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Example 5.1.6 (h) from "Introduction to Real Analysis" (Fourth Edition) by Robert G. Bartle and Donald R. Sherbert, specifically regarding the finiteness of rational numbers with denominators less than a given integer \( n_0 \) within the interval \( (b-1, b+1) \). Peter clarifies that for any positive integer \( k < n_0 \), the maximum number of rational numbers with denominator \( k \) in the interval is \( 2k \), leading to the conclusion that there are only finitely many such rational numbers in the specified interval. This conclusion is supported by the principle that a finite union of finite sets remains finite.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rational numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with intervals and their lengths in real analysis
  • Basic knowledge of finite sets and unions in set theory
  • Concept of denominators in rational numbers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of finite sets in set theory
  • Explore the properties of rational numbers in real analysis
  • Learn about intervals and their implications in calculus
  • Investigate the implications of denominators on the distribution of rational numbers
USEFUL FOR

Students of real analysis, educators teaching mathematical concepts, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of continuous functions and rational number properties.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading "Introduction to Real Analysis" (Fourth Edition) b Robert G Bartle and Donald R Sherbert ...

I am focused on Chapter 5: Continuous Functions ...

I need help in fully understanding an aspect of Example 5.1.6 (h) ...Example 5.1.6 (h) ... ... reads as follows:
View attachment 7262In the above text from Bartle and Sherbert, we read the following:

" ... ... There are only a finite number of rationals with denominator less than $$n_0 $$in the interval $$( b - 1, b + 1)$$. (Why? ) ... ... Can someone explain to me why the above statement holds true?Help will be appreciated ... ...

Peter*** EDIT ***

... oh ... just realized that if denominator has to be less than $$n_0$$ then there can only be, at most, $$n_0 -1$$ of these rational numbers ... that is ... a finite number! ... ... ... Is that correct!

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose that $k$ is a positive integer less than $n_0$. The distance between consecutive rational numbers with denominator $k$ is $1/k$. So there at most $k$ such numbers in an interval of length $1$. Therefore there are at most $2k$ such numbers in the interval $(b-1,b+1)$, which has length $2$.

Thus for each of the finitely many numbers $k$ ($1\leqslant k\leqslant n_0$) there are only finitely many rational numbers with denominator $k$ in the interval $(b-1,b+1)$. But a finite union of finite sets is finite. Thus there are only finitely many rational numbers with denominator $\leqslant n_0$ in the interval $(b-1,b+1)$.
 
Opalg said:
Suppose that $k$ is a positive integer less than $n_0$. The distance between consecutive rational numbers with denominator $k$ is $1/k$. So there at most $k$ such numbers in an interval of length $1$. Therefore there are at most $2k$ such numbers in the interval $(b-1,b+1)$, which has length $2$.

Thus for each of the finitely many numbers $k$ ($1\leqslant k\leqslant n_0$) there are only finitely many rational numbers with denominator $k$ in the interval $(b-1,b+1)$. But a finite union of finite sets is finite. Thus there are only finitely many rational numbers with denominator $\leqslant n_0$ in the interval $(b-1,b+1)$.
Hmm ... really interesting ...

Required a more thoughtful analysis than my first intuitive reaction ...:( ...

Thanks for the help ... enables me to see what is required in analysis ...

Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K