Limits of Functions .... B&S Theorem 4.2.9 .... ....

In summary, the conversation revolves around understanding the proof of Theorem 4.2.9 in "Introduction to Real Analysis" by Bartle and Sherbert. The discussion focuses on a specific part of the proof which states that if x belongs to A intersection V delta of c and x is not equal to c, then f of x is greater than half of L, which is greater than 0. The conversation concludes with Euge providing an explanation for why this statement is true.
  • #1
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
3,998
48
I am reading "Introduction to Real Analysis" (Fourth Edition) b Robert G Bartle and Donald R Sherbert ...

I am focused on Chapter 4: Limits ...

I need help in fully understanding an aspect of the proof of Theorem 4.2.9 ...Theorem 4.2.9 ... ... reads as follows:https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/7257In the above text from Bartle and Sherbert we read the following:"... ... Therefore (why?) it follows that if \(\displaystyle x \in A \cap V_{ \delta } (c), x \neq c\), then \(\displaystyle f(x) \gt \frac{1}{2} L \gt 0\). ... ... Can someone please explain why/how it is true that if \(\displaystyle x \in A \cap V_{ \delta } (c), x \neq c\), then \(\displaystyle f(x) \gt \frac{1}{2} L \gt 0\)?
Hope someone can help ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I take it $V_\delta(c)$ is the open interval $(c - \delta, c + \delta)$. In that case, if $x\in A\cap V_\delta(c)$ and $x\neq c$, then $x\in A$ and $0 < |x - c| < \delta$. Thus $|f(x) - L| < (1/2)L$, or $-(1/2)L < f(x) - L < (1/2)L$. In particular, $f(x) - L > -(1/2)L$, so $f(x) > L - (1/2)L = (1/2)L > 0$, as desired.
 
  • #3
Euge said:
I take it $V_\delta(c)$ is the open interval $(c - \delta, c + \delta)$. In that case, if $x\in A\cap V_\delta(c)$ and $x\neq c$, then $x\in A$ and $0 < |x - c| < \delta$. Thus $|f(x) - L| < (1/2)L$, or $-(1/2)L < f(x) - L < (1/2)L$. In particular, $f(x) - L > -(1/2)L$, so $f(x) > L - (1/2)L = (1/2)L > 0$, as desired.
Thanks Euge ...

Appreciate your help ...

Peter
 
Back
Top