Continuum Mechanics - Deformation gradient

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on the development of the deformation gradient in continuum mechanics, specifically leading to Green's deformation tensor. Key equations discussed include the relationship between the differential position vectors dx and dX, expressed as dx^2 - dX^2 = (xi,a*xi,b - δab)*dXa*dXb, where δab represents the Kronecker delta. The introduction of subscripts and the use of the Einstein summation convention are clarified, emphasizing their roles in tensor notation and vector relationships. The Cauchy-Green tensor and finite strain tensor are also defined, providing a comprehensive understanding of deformation in material bodies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of continuum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with tensor notation and the Einstein summation convention
  • Knowledge of the deformation gradient tensor F
  • Basic concepts of strain tensors, specifically the Cauchy-Green tensor
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the Cauchy-Green tensor in material deformation
  • Learn about the finite strain tensor and its significance in continuum mechanics
  • Explore the implications of the Kronecker delta in tensor calculus
  • Investigate the relationship between deformation gradients and physical properties of materials
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mechanical engineering, materials science, and applied mathematics who are interested in the mathematical foundations of continuum mechanics and deformation analysis.

tricha122
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I am trying to self-learn continuum mechanics, and I have a question regarding the development of the deformation gradient (which ultimately leads to green's deformation tensor).

I have attached the specifics of the question in a attached photo.

Ultimately, there comes a point when determining the deformation using the change in magnitude of the square of dX and dx:

dx^2 - dX^2 = dxidxi-dXadXa

However, somehow using a previous equation (dxi = xi,adXa) and the susbtitution property of the kronecker delta, they come up with:

dx^2 - dX^2 = xi,adXa*xi,bdXb - delta(ab)*dXa*dXb

My question is - how was the kronecker delta substituted in? There is no direction associated with magnitudes. Further - where did the subscript "B" come from and what does it represent physically?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • Continuum Mechanics - Deformation Gradient.png
    Continuum Mechanics - Deformation Gradient.png
    36.9 KB · Views: 685
Physics news on Phys.org
First the subscript B is introduced as part of the kronecker delta, δij or δAB here.

It is only a dummy and does not really matter since if B ≠ a then δAB = 0

Which brings us to why the kronecker?

Well this is a way of writing the dot product of the vectors dXi and dxi etc.

Don't forget that the quantities in this diagram are vectors so additions and multiplicasions are vector additions and multiplications.
 
Studiot said:
First the subscript B is introduced as part of the kronecker delta, δij or δAB here.

It is only a dummy and does not really matter since if B ≠ a then δAB = 0

Which brings us to why the kronecker?

Well this is a way of writing the dot product of the vectors dXi and dxi etc.

Don't forget that the quantities in this diagram are vectors so additions and multiplicasions are vector additions and multiplications.


Thank you for your response. However, I still am trying to wrap my head around the introduction of a new variable.

After substiuting out dXa,

(dx)^2 - (dX)^2 = (xi,a*xi,a - 1)*dXa*dXa

how does the kronecker delta substitute (dijej = ei) in here to get the next equation?

(dx^2) - (dX)^2 = (xi,a*xi,b - dab)*dXa*dXb

if a = b, then you get the previous equation.

If a =/ b, then you get

(dx^2) - (dX)^2 = (xi,a*xi,b)*dXa*dXb

which I am not sure what that means physically.
 
tricha122 said:
Thank you for your response. However, I still am trying to wrap my head around the introduction of a new variable.

After substiuting out dXa,

(dx)^2 - (dX)^2 = (xi,a*xi,a - 1)*dXa*dXa

how does the kronecker delta substitute (dijej = ei) in here to get the next equation?

(dx^2) - (dX)^2 = (xi,a*xi,b - dab)*dXa*dXb

if a = b, then you get the previous equation.

If a =/ b, then you get

(dx^2) - (dX)^2 = (xi,a*xi,b)*dXa*dXb

which I am not sure what that means physically.

Further, Cab = xi,a*xi,b = F^t * F confusing me even further suggesting that xi,a xi,b are the transpose of each other when a=b.
 
You realize, of course, that the Einstein summation convention is being used here. Thus,

dX_adX_a=\delta_{a,b}dX_adX_b=(dX_1)^2 +(dX_2)^2 +(dX_3)^2

In tensorial notation, δi,j are the components of the identity tensor (aka, unit tensor or metric tensor) I.

It is often more revealing to write these equations in dyadic tensor notation. Let dx represent a differential position vector between two material points in the deformed configuration of the body, and let dX represent the differential position vector between these same two material points prior to the deformation. The vectors dx and dX can be related to one another in terms of the deformation gradient tensor F:

\mathbf{dx}=\mathbf{F}\cdot\mathbf{dX}

The squared length of the vector dx in the deformed configuration of the body can be determined by taking the dot product of dx with itself:

\mathbf{dx}\cdot\mathbf{dx}=\mathbf{dX}\cdot (\mathbf {F^T}\cdot\mathbf{F})\cdot\mathbf{dX}

The change in the squared length of the differential position vector between the two material points in the deformed and undeformed configurations of the body is given by:

\mathbf{dx}\cdot\mathbf{dx}-\mathbf{dX}\cdot\mathbf{dX} =\mathbf{dX}\cdot (\mathbf {F^T}\cdot\mathbf{F}-\mathbf{I})\cdot\mathbf{dX}

The Cauchy-Green tensor is defined by:

\mathbf{C}=\mathbf {F^T}\cdot\mathbf{F}

So \mathbf{dx}\cdot\mathbf{dx}-\mathbf{dX}\cdot\mathbf{dX} =\mathbf{dX}\cdot (\mathbf {C-I})\cdot\mathbf{dX}

It is also possible to define the finite strain tensor E as:

2\mathbf{E}=\mathbf{C-I}

I hope this helps.

Chet
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
29K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K