Contour integration exp(ikx)/x

  • Thread starter Thread starter aranud
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the principal value integral of exp(ikx)/x from -infinity to infinity using contour integration techniques. The formula integral f(x)/(x-x0) = i*pi/f(x0) + 2pi*(residus poles) is applied, confirming that the integral evaluates to i*pi when the pole is at x=0. The challenge arises when displacing the pole to x+iε, leading to confusion about the behavior of the integral in relation to the sign of k. The conclusion emphasizes that the sign of k affects the integral's value, necessitating careful consideration of the contour closure based on k's sign.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of contour integration techniques
  • Familiarity with Jordan's lemma
  • Knowledge of residue theorem in complex analysis
  • Basic concepts of principal value integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the residue theorem in detail to understand pole contributions
  • Learn about Jordan's lemma and its applications in complex analysis
  • Explore the implications of contour closure based on the sign of k
  • Investigate the properties of principal value integrals in complex functions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying complex analysis, as well as physicists dealing with integrals in quantum mechanics and wave phenomena.

aranud
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the principal value integral exp(ikx)/x from -infinity to infinity first with a formula derived in the textbook and then by displacing the pole. Use this result to calculate the integral of sin(x)/x from -infinity to infinity.


Homework Equations


If the integral around the contour in the upper half of the plane goes to zero when the radius goes to infinity one can use the following formula:
integral f(x)/(x-x0) = i*pi/f(x0)+2pi*(residus poles) The poles in the domain around which you integrate.


The Attempt at a Solution


I've managed to prove with jordan's lemma that the upper part of the contour goes to zero when integrated so the formula can be used. Since the only pole is on the contour at x=0 we get that the integral is i*pi*1. This isn't so weird because the integrand isn't real either.

My problem is with the displacement of the pole technique. If we displace the pole north by changing the integrand to exp(ikx)/(x+iε) the integrand is split in an imaginary and real part:
limε→0 RE[int(sin(kx)/(x+iε)] + i limε→0 RE[int(icos(kx)/(x+iε))]

But because there are no poles in the domain around which I integrate these should both be zero? I think I'm missing something very basic here but Ican't figure out what it is.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The way you close the contour should depend on the sign of k. Did you take that into account?
 
Well the problem statement just said k was real number so I tacitly assumed it to be positive and closed the contour in the half plane. The integral shouldn't depend on which half-plane you use to close the contour anyway.
edit: apparently the sign of the integral does depend on k. But if I manage to solve it for k positive I'll understand the k negative problem too.
 
aranud said:
Well the problem statement just said k was real number so I tacitly assumed it to be positive and closed the contour in the half plane. The integral shouldn't depend on which half-plane you use to close the contour anyway.
edit: apparently the sign of the integral does depend on k. But if I manage to solve it for k positive I'll understand the k negative problem too.

For the first calculation, you can just change your variables so that the exponential eikx is replaced with ei|k|x, and you get your result easily. But what happens if you try doing after you have displaced the pole?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K