Contour Integration for Inverse Mellin Transform

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Love*Physics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Transform
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
Love*Physics
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Can anyone gave me a solved example on Inverse Mellin transform?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi. I think Wikipedia has a good section on the Mellin transform pair. Although they go about it a little differently, the integral is just the sum of the residues inside the indicated contour.

[tex]\mathcal{M}^{-1}\left\{\frac{\pi}{\sin(\pi s)}\right\}=\frac{1}{2\pi i}\mathop\int\limits_{c-i\infty}^{c+i\infty}\frac{\pi}{x^s\sin(\pi s)}ds=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(-x)^n=\frac{1}{1+x};\quad |x|<1.[/tex]

That sum is obtained from taking the residues inside a square contour with right boundary on [tex]c\pm i\infty[/tex] and allowed to expand to infinity. The integral tends to zero on the remaining three legs and we're left with (via the Residue Theorem) an infinite sum of residues corresponding to the poles at [tex]-n[/tex]:

[tex]\mathop\textnormal{Res}\limits_{z=-n}\left\{\frac{\pi}{x^s\sin(\pi s)}\right\}=(-x)^n,\quad n=0,-1,-2,\cdots[/tex]
 
ok but Why you choose the pole -n ? i can take the residue at n and 0
 
Ok, approach this strictly in terms of contour integration: it's a rectangular contour with corners at [tex]c\pm i \infty[/tex], and [tex]-\infty\pm i\infty[/tex]. Then that contour encloses the poles at [tex]n=0,-1,-2,-3,\cdots[/tex]. And by the Residue Theorem, the integral, assuming the other legs go to zero, is just [tex]2\pi i[/tex] times the sum of the residues at that set of poles.

Also, I though it was a bit of a challenge to show:

[tex] \mathop\textnormal{Res}\limits_{z=-n}\left\{\frac{\pi}{x^s\sin(\pi s)}\right\}=(-x)^n,\quad n=0,-1,-2,\cdots[/tex]

for me anyway. Maybe an easier way to do though.