Contour Integration for Inverse Mellin Transform

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Love*Physics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Transform
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Inverse Mellin Transform, specifically focusing on contour integration techniques used to evaluate it. Participants explore the mathematical details and implications of using residues in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests a solved example of the Inverse Mellin Transform.
  • Another participant references Wikipedia, suggesting that the integral can be evaluated as the sum of residues within a specified contour, providing a specific example involving the function \(\frac{\pi}{\sin(\pi s)}\).
  • A participant questions the choice of poles at \(-n\), suggesting that residues at \(n\) and \(0\) could also be considered.
  • A further response clarifies that the contour is rectangular and encloses the poles at \(n=0, -1, -2, -3, \ldots\), emphasizing the application of the Residue Theorem to evaluate the integral.
  • The same participant expresses that demonstrating the residue calculation was challenging and hints at the possibility of alternative methods.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the choice of poles for residue calculation, indicating a disagreement on the approach to evaluating the Inverse Mellin Transform.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the behavior of integrals along different contour paths and the conditions under which the integral tends to zero on certain legs of the contour.

Love*Physics
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Can anyone gave me a solved example on Inverse Mellin transform?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi. I think Wikipedia has a good section on the Mellin transform pair. Although they go about it a little differently, the integral is just the sum of the residues inside the indicated contour.

\mathcal{M}^{-1}\left\{\frac{\pi}{\sin(\pi s)}\right\}=\frac{1}{2\pi i}\mathop\int\limits_{c-i\infty}^{c+i\infty}\frac{\pi}{x^s\sin(\pi s)}ds=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(-x)^n=\frac{1}{1+x};\quad |x|<1.

That sum is obtained from taking the residues inside a square contour with right boundary on c\pm i\infty and allowed to expand to infinity. The integral tends to zero on the remaining three legs and we're left with (via the Residue Theorem) an infinite sum of residues corresponding to the poles at -n:

\mathop\textnormal{Res}\limits_{z=-n}\left\{\frac{\pi}{x^s\sin(\pi s)}\right\}=(-x)^n,\quad n=0,-1,-2,\cdots
 
ok but Why you choose the pole -n ? i can take the residue at n and 0
 
Ok, approach this strictly in terms of contour integration: it's a rectangular contour with corners at c\pm i \infty, and -\infty\pm i\infty. Then that contour encloses the poles at n=0,-1,-2,-3,\cdots. And by the Residue Theorem, the integral, assuming the other legs go to zero, is just 2\pi i times the sum of the residues at that set of poles.

Also, I though it was a bit of a challenge to show:

<br /> \mathop\textnormal{Res}\limits_{z=-n}\left\{\frac{\pi}{x^s\sin(\pi s)}\right\}=(-x)^n,\quad n=0,-1,-2,\cdots<br />

for me anyway. Maybe an easier way to do though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K