Contour Integration: Solving Homework Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter shehry1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating a limit of an integral involving a complex exponential function and a step function, specifically using contour integration techniques. The problem includes concepts from Laurent series and the residue theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of a semi-circular contour in the upper half-plane and the conditions under which this is valid, particularly focusing on the behavior of the integral as the parameter approaches zero.
  • There are questions about how to handle the integral over the semi-circular arc and its contribution to the overall integral.
  • Some participants explore the implications of the variable y in relation to the contour integration and its connection to the step function.
  • Concerns are raised about the placement of poles and the necessity of indentations in the contour to ensure proper evaluation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and clarifications regarding the conditions for closing the contour and the implications for the step function. There is a recognition of the need to carefully consider the behavior of the integral based on the value of y, but no consensus has been reached on the final approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem's setup may require specific assumptions about the direction from which alpha approaches zero, as well as the interpretation of variables involved in the integral.

shehry1
Messages
39
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



lim_{\alpha\rightarrow 0} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dx. e^{ixy}/(2\Pi i (x-i \alpha)) = H(y)
where H(y) is the step function ie. H(y) = 1 for y > 0, H(y) = 0 (otherwise)
Compute using an appropriate contour integral.


Homework Equations


-Laurent series
-Residue theorem
-Concepts from contour integration


The Attempt at a Solution


I found the residue and its e^{-y \alpha} for a semi circular contour lying in the top half plane. Mathematica vouches for that.

To find the integral, I followed the usual procedure.
1. Define a semi circular contour
2. Separate the contour into two parts one along the x-axis and the other constituting the semicircular arc. The straight line becomes the desired integral.

Problems:
-How do I reduce the Integral for the semi-circular arc to zero.
-If it IS zero, how do I relate the residue which is an exponential to the step function.

I was thinking that this might be something like an inverse Fourier transform. But the Fourier transform of the Step function involves a Delta function: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FourierTransformHeavisideStepFunction.html
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can only close that in the upper half plane if y>0. This is because you need to be able to ignore the contribution from the semicircle as r->infinity. In the upper half plane Im(x)>0 so you have a negative real part of the exponential. If y<0 then you need to close in the lower half plane. That's where the 'step function' quality comes from.
 
Maybe I'm just crazy, but as a goes to 0, you don't know if it's going to be in your contour, so you probably need to have an indentation around the origin (with the origin contained in your contour) in order to ensure that for small values of |a| the pole is in the contour (and then at the very end you take the limit of the radius of the indentation going to zero).
 
Office_Shredder said:
Maybe I'm just crazy, but as a goes to 0, you don't know if it's going to be in your contour, so you probably need to have an indentation around the origin (with the origin contained in your contour) in order to ensure that for small values of |a| the pole is in the contour (and then at the very end you take the limit of the radius of the indentation going to zero).

You can't really do that. It's important to the argument that the pole is in the upper half plane. If alpha goes to zero from the negative direction you get the wrong step function. The problem should have stated it goes to zero from the positive direction.
 
Dick said:
You can only close that in the upper half plane if y>0. This is because you need to be able to ignore the contribution from the semicircle as r->infinity. In the upper half plane Im(x)>0 so you have a negative real part of the exponential. If y<0 then you need to close in the lower half plane. That's where the 'step function' quality comes from.

That clears up a lot in my foggy brain but there are still some issues. The y in the integral. Is this the complex part of the variable in the contour integral. i.e. z = x+iy. Or is it just some arbitrary variable. I thought that it was not connected to the integration variable in the contour integral and simply substituted z for x
 
shehry1 said:
That clears up a lot in my foggy brain but there are still some issues. The y in the integral. Is this the complex part of the variable in the contour integral. i.e. z = x+iy. Or is it just some arbitrary variable. I thought that it was not connected to the integration variable in the contour integral and simply substituted z for x

It's not connected with the integration variable. The y in the integral is the y in H(y). It's a real number.
 
You have to look at the e^(i*z*y) part in the numerator. Since y is real the real part of i*z*y is -y*Im(z), right? To argue that you can ignore the contribution for the circular part of the contour you want to be able to say that is SMALL for large values of Im(z). If y>0 that means you want Im(z)>0 and large. That means upper half plane. Vice versa for y<0. Making the contour move to the lower half plane when y<0 is just what you want! No enclosed pole means integral=0, H(y)=0.
 
Dick said:
It's not connected with the integration variable. The y in the integral is the y in H(y). It's a real number.

Eureka.

Thanks a lot
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K