Is F(x)=\sqrt{1+x^2} a Contraction Mapping on R?

Click For Summary
F(x) = √(1+x²) is proposed as a contraction mapping on R due to its derivative being less than one. However, the derivative approaches 1 as x approaches infinity, indicating that it does not satisfy the strict criteria for a contraction mapping. The absence of a fixed point where F(x) = x further supports this conclusion. Therefore, F(x) does not qualify as a contraction mapping according to the definition. The discussion highlights the importance of adhering to the contraction mapping theorem's requirements.
flash
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
If I take F(x)=\sqrt{1+x^2}, then the derivative is always less than one so this is a contraction mapping from R to R, right?

But there is no fixed point where F(x)=x, where the contraction mapping theorem says there should be.

So where have I gone wrong?

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The derivative is less than 1, true. But it approaches 1 as x->infinity. So there is no q<1 such that f'(x)<q. It's NOT a contraction mapping. Look again at the definition of 'contraction mapping'.
 
Thanks :-)
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
907
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K