Control of US ports: Bush selling out on US security?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Control Security
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of the Bush administration's approval of a sale that allows a company from the United Arab Emirates to control operations at several major U.S. ports. Participants explore themes of national security, foreign ownership, and the historical context of port management.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express disbelief over the sale, questioning how national security can be ensured by transferring control to a foreign entity.
  • Others argue that concerns about national security are exaggerated, noting that the ports were previously managed by a British company without similar outcry.
  • There are claims that the current opposition may be influenced by xenophobia, particularly against Arab entities, rather than genuine security concerns.
  • Some participants highlight the historical context, suggesting that the focus on the UAE's ownership is misplaced given the ports' prior foreign management.
  • Concerns are raised about the UAE's past connections to terrorism and the implications of allowing a company from that country to manage critical infrastructure.
  • Participants debate the role of the Coast Guard and government oversight in maintaining port security, questioning whether foreign management fundamentally changes security dynamics.
  • Some express skepticism about the motivations behind the sale, suggesting political and financial interests may be at play.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; multiple competing views remain regarding the implications of foreign ownership of U.S. ports and the associated national security risks.

Contextual Notes

Discussions include references to historical ownership of the ports, the role of the Coast Guard, and the implications of outsourcing operations to foreign companies. There are unresolved questions about the adequacy of current security measures and the potential risks associated with the UAE's involvement.

  • #301
But wait, the matter of US national security gets even better,

U.S. Hiring Hong Kong Co. to Scan Nukes :biggrin:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060323/ap_on_go_pr_wh/port_security_bahamas

WASHINGTON - In the aftermath of the Dubai ports dispute, the Bush administration is hiring a Hong Kong conglomerate to help detect nuclear materials inside cargo passing through the Bahamas to the United States and elsewhere.

The administration acknowledges the no-bid contract with Hutchison Whampoa Ltd. represents the first time a foreign company will be involved in running a sophisticated U.S. radiation detector at an overseas port without American customs agents present.

Freeport in the Bahamas is 65 miles from the U.S. coast, where cargo would be likely to be inspected again. The contract is currently being finalized.

The administration is negotiating a second no-bid contract for a Philippine company to install radiation detectors in its home country, according to documents obtained by The Associated Press. At dozens of other overseas ports, foreign governments are primarily responsible for scanning cargo.

While President Bush recently reassured Congress that foreigners would not manage security at U.S. ports, the Hutchison deal in the Bahamas illustrates how the administration is relying on foreign companies at overseas ports to safeguard cargo headed to the United States.

Hutchison Whampoa is the world's largest ports operator and among the industry's most-respected companies. It was an early adopter of U.S. anti-terror measures. But its billionaire chairman, Li Ka-Shing, also has substantial business ties to China's government that have raised U.S. concerns over the years.

"Li Ka-Shing is pretty close to a lot of senior leaders of the Chinese government and the Chinese Communist Party," said Larry M. Wortzel, head of a U.S. government commission that studies China security and economic issues. But Wortzel said Hutchison operates independently from Beijing, and he described Li as "a very legitimate international businessman."

Business is business.

Well, Hutchison Whampoa is a respected company.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
8K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
20K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K