Control type problem from mechanics

  • Thread starter Thread starter wrobel
  • Start date Start date
wrobel
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,243
Reaction score
1,051
I saw this problem several years ago in a Russian journal devoted to physics olympiads. This problem was discussed there under some certain simplifying assumptions which I do not remember. I tried to solve it without simplifications but laziness and large formulas stopped me. Nevertheless, I find this problem interesting and solvable and perhaps some of PF participants will be interested in it.



A rod ##AB## of mass ##M## and length ##\ell## can slide without friction along the axes ##OX## and ##OY## by its hinges ##B## and ##A## respectively. A bug ##C## of mass ##m## runs downwards along the rod. Can the bug's run be such that the rod does not move?

My suggestion is as follows.
Let us regard the function ##u(t)=|AC|## as a given function. Then we have a Lagrangian system with one degree of freedom. For a generalized coordinate take an angle ##\varphi=OAB##.
Then write down the Lagrange equation and substitute there ##\varphi=\mathrm{const}##. We will have an equation for the function ##u(t)##.
Screenshot_20260106_150933.webp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
wrobel said:
A bug C of mass m runs downwards along the rod.
"Downwards" suggests that the rod is being accelerated down the y-axis and along the x-axis by gravity.
wrobel said:
Can the bug's run be such that the rod does not move?
Yes, but only for a finite time.

While the force along the rod, due to gravity, is equal to the force applied by the running bug, the rod will remain in equilibrium. The bug will accelerate down the stationary rod, until it reaches B, on the x-axis, then shortly after, it may be crushed by the rod after the rod begins to slide.

The question becomes, can the rod ever catch up with the accelerated bug?
 
By accelerating its small mass (m) along the bar, the muscular force of the bug will need to induce a vertical component equal to (M+m)g.
That would be easier achieved at positions of the bar closer to vertical.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
571
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
6K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
10K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K