Convergence and Uniform Convergence of Sequences of Functions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence and uniform convergence of sequences of functions, specifically focusing on sequences of functions \( f_n \) and real sequences \( s_n \) with given bounds. The original poster seeks to demonstrate conditions under which the uniform convergence of \( \sum_{k=0}^{n} f_k \) can be established based on the properties of \( \sum_{k=0}^{n} s_k \).

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between Cauchy sequences and convergence, questioning how to connect the properties of \( s_n \) to those of \( f_n \). The original poster expresses uncertainty about integrating their observations into a coherent argument.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the definitions of convergence and Cauchy sequences, suggesting ways to approach the problem. There is an acknowledgment of the relationship between uniform convergence and uniform Cauchy sequences, but no consensus has been reached on the specific steps to take next.

Contextual Notes

The original poster is working within the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can use or the methods they can apply. There is an emphasis on understanding the definitions and properties of convergence in the context of sequences of functions.

Yagoda
Messages
45
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


fn is a sequence of functions and sn is a sequence of reals such that 0 ≤ fn(x) ≤ sn for all x.
I want to show that if [itex]\sum_{k=0}^{n}s_k[/itex] is Cauchy then [itex]\sum_{k=0}^{n}f_k[/itex] is uniformly Cauchy and that if [itex]\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}s_k[/itex] converges then [itex]\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}f_k[/itex] converges uniformly.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


If [itex]\sum_{k=0}^{n}s_k[/itex] is Cauchy then that means there exists an N such that [itex]\left|\sum_{k=0}^{n}s_k-\sum_{k=0}^{m}s_k\right|<\epsilon[/itex] for all [itex]\epsilon[/itex] where m,n >N.
Also [itex]\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}f_k\leq \sum_{k=0}^{n}f_k[/itex] for all n because every fn is at least zero and [itex]\sum_{k=0}^{n}f_k\leq \sum_{k=0}^{n}s_k[/itex].
I guess I'm missing how to put these pieces together.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a fact about real Cauchy sequences which you should know: a real sequence converges if and only if it is Cauchy (if you don't know that, try to prove it for yourself).

If [itex]\sum s_n[/itex] converges, then [itex]\sum f_n(x)[/itex] converges for all x, because for all x every term is positive and less than or equal to the corresponding term of [itex]\sum s_n[/itex].

Just for convenience I'll define [itex]S = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} s_k[/itex], [itex]S_n = \sum_{k=0}^n s_k[/itex], [itex]F(x) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} f_k(x)[/itex] and [itex]F_n(x) = \sum_{k=0}^n f_k(x)[/itex].

You want to show that [itex]F_n \to F[/itex] uniformly, the definition of which is that for all [itex]\epsilon > 0[/itex] there exists [itex]N \in \mathbb{N}[/itex] such that for all [itex]x[/itex], if [itex]n \geq N[/itex] then [itex]|F(x) - F_n(x)| < \epsilon[/itex]. So you might like to consider
[tex] |F(x) - F_n(x)| = |F(x) - S + S - S_n + S_n - F_n(x)|[/tex]
and recall the definition of convergence of [itex]S_n \to S[/itex].

You may then want to satisfy yourself that if [itex]F_n \to F[/itex] uniformly then [itex]F_n[/itex] is uniformly Cauchy (and vice versa).
 
pasmith said:
You want to show that [itex]F_n \to F[/itex] uniformly, the definition of which is that for all [itex]\epsilon > 0[/itex] there exists [itex]N \in \mathbb{N}[/itex] such that for all [itex]x[/itex], if [itex]n \geq N[/itex] then [itex]|F(x) - F_n(x)| < \epsilon[/itex]. So you might like to consider
[tex] |F(x) - F_n(x)| = |F(x) - S + S - S_n + S_n - F_n(x)|[/tex]
and recall the definition of convergence of [itex]S_n \to S[/itex].

Scratch that: instead consider that, for all x,
[tex] |F(x) - F_n(x)| = \sum_{k=n+1}^{\infty} f_k(x) \leq \sum_{k=n+1}^{\infty} s_k<br /> = |S - S_n|[/tex]
and recall the definition of convergence of [itex]S_n \to S[/itex].
 
That was very helpful. Thanks for reminding me about the relationship between Cauchy and convergence of real sequences. Don't know how I overlooked that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K