Convergence of a Sequence of Partial Sums

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the convergence of a sequence of partial sums, denoted as (s_n), and its implications for the sequence (a_n). It is established that if (s_n) converges, then (a_n) must converge to zero, as shown through the relationship between convergent sequences and Cauchy sequences. The theorem referenced indicates that convergence of (s_n) implies it is a Cauchy sequence, which in turn leads to the conclusion that the terms of (a_n) must approach zero. The discussion also highlights that convergence of (a_n) does not guarantee convergence of (s_n), illustrated by the harmonic series example.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sequences and series in mathematics
  • Familiarity with the concept of convergence in sequences
  • Knowledge of Cauchy sequences and their properties
  • Basic understanding of limits and their application in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Cauchy sequences in detail
  • Explore the implications of the convergence of series, particularly the harmonic series
  • Learn about the relationship between convergence of sequences and their partial sums
  • Investigate the formal definitions and proofs of convergence in real analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying calculus or real analysis, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to sequences and series convergence.

AKJ1
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi, I am reviewing a practice exam for my course and I am a bit stuck.

"Assume that a sequence of partial sums (s_n) converges, can we also then say the sequence a_n is convergent? Does this statement go both ways?

Answer: Yes, yes"

The Attempt at a Solution



On our exam, we merely pick yes or no for these type of questions, but I actually want to know why this is true. I can't find a counter example to say its false, but I don't actually know why its true.

My intuition:

A sequence of partial sums would be something like,

A1 , A1 + A2 , A1 + A2 + A3... So if this is convergent, the limit exists.

Now I am having difficulty directly following from this that the sequence a_n is also convergent.

S1 = A1
S2 = A1+A2
.
.
.
.
if we just apply the limit to both sides and show they both exist...is that enough? Is it possible one side will go to infinity?

In essence, for the limit of the partial sums to exist, we require that the terms of a_n decrease?

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the meaning of "a sequence of partial sums (s_n) converges" ?
If that means ##s_n \rightarrow l## it also means ##s_{n-1} \rightarrow l##, right ?
What is the consequence for ##a_n## ? :rolleyes:

Theorem 3.2 http://web.mat.bham.ac.uk/R.W.Kaye/seqser/intro2series.pdf
 
Are you familiar with the concept of "Cauchy sequence"? It's pretty easy to prove the following implications:

##(s_n)## is convergent ##\Rightarrow## ##(s_n)## is Cauchy ##\Rightarrow## ##a_n\to 0##.

For the question of whether convergence of ##(a_n)## is sufficient to ensure convergence of ##(s_n)##, consider the series ##\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac 1 n##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K