Convergence of alternating series

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence of an alternating series defined by the sum \(\sum(from n=1 to \infty)(-1)^{n+1}a_n\) and its n-th partial sum \(s_n\). The original poster is tasked with demonstrating the inequality \(|s - s_n| \leq a_{n+1}\), but expresses uncertainty about how to approach the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the validity of the original statement and question the assumptions regarding the sequence \(a_n\). There are attempts to clarify the conditions under which the inequality holds, particularly focusing on whether \(a_n\) must be nonnegative and decreasing to zero. The original poster seeks guidance on how to begin the proof and expresses confusion about the counterexamples presented.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with some participants providing counterexamples that challenge the original poster's understanding. There is a suggestion to analyze the difference between two partial sums to explore the Cauchy sequence property, indicating a potential direction for the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the implications of the assumptions about the sequence \(a_n\) and the specific conditions required for the inequality to hold. The original poster has confirmed the wording of the homework question, which may be contributing to the confusion regarding the assumptions needed for the proof.

vikkisut88
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let s be the sum of the alternating series [tex]\sum[/tex](from n=1 to [tex]\infty[/tex])(-1)n+1an with n-th partial sum sn. Show that |s - sn| [tex]\leq[/tex]an+1



Homework Equations


I know about Cauchy sequences, the Ratio test, the Root test


The Attempt at a Solution


I really have no idea where I'm meant to start with this question. I didn't know whether I thne have to take more partial sums i.e. partial sums of the n-th partial sum and work with it from there, or something else. I would be really grateful if someone could help me out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think your statement is true as you gave it.
For example, let
[tex]\begin{cases}<br /> a_0 & {} = 1 \\<br /> a_1 & {} = 0 \\<br /> a_n & {} = 2^{-n} \qquad (n > 1)<br /> \end{cases}[/tex]

Then s = 3/2, |s - s0| = |5/6 - 1| = |-1/6| = 1/6 which is not smaller than a1 = 0.

[edit]I had s = 5/6, I think it should be 3/2. Doesn't affect my argument though.[/edit]
 
Last edited:
sorry i don't really understand that - how did you work out that s was 5/6? And did you just choose random values for a0, a1 and an? I have rechecked my homework question and that is exactly what it said!
 
CompuChip just gave you a counterexample. To prove your conclusion, you also need to assume that a_n is a nonnegative sequence decreasing to zero monotonically. That might be what you are missing.
 
okay, but i still don't understand how I'm meant to show the result, sorry. This question has got me completely flummoxed.
 
Start by looking at the difference of two partial sums |s_m-s_n| for m<n. Try to show that's less than or equal to a_m+1. Write down the terms making up the difference and regroup them. This would show the sequence is Cauchy, right?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K