Convergence of Fourier Series Coefficients for L2 Functions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the convergence of Fourier series coefficients for functions in L² space, specifically demonstrating that for any function f in L²[-π, π], the inner product (f, e_n) approaches zero as |n| approaches infinity. The participants explore the implications of Bessel's inequality and the completeness of the basis {e_n} in establishing this convergence. Key points include the use of L²-convergence and the necessity of understanding absolute convergence in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of L² spaces and their properties
  • Familiarity with Fourier series and orthonormal bases
  • Knowledge of Bessel's inequality
  • Basic concepts of convergence in functional analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Bessel's inequality in functional analysis
  • Learn about L²-convergence and its relationship to absolute convergence
  • Explore the completeness of orthonormal systems in Hilbert spaces
  • Investigate the Dominated Convergence Theorem and its applications
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in functional analysis, students studying Fourier analysis, and anyone interested in the properties of L² functions and convergence of series.

Kindayr
Messages
159
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let e_{n}(t)= \frac{1}{ \sqrt{2\pi}}\cdot e^{int} for n\in\mathbb{Z} and -\pi\le t\le\pi.

Show that for any f\in L^{2}[-\pi,\pi] we have that (f,e_{n})=\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}f(t)\cdot e^{-int}dt\to0 as |n|\to \infty.

The Attempt at a Solution


I want to use dominant convergence, but unfortunately measure theory isn't a prerequisite for this course. Any help will be awesome!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wait, if {e_n} is complete, then \lim_{n\to\infty}\sum_{m=-n}^{n}(f,e_m)e_m converges to f absolutely, so the coefficients necessarily converge to zero. Would this work?
 
Have you seen and proved Bessel's inequality??
 
Yep we have. Could I say that:

Since \{e_n\} is complete it follows that f=\lim_{n\to\infty} \sum_{m=-n}^{n}(f,e_m)e_m. Thus, the latter sum converges and hence \lim_{n\to\infty}\sum_{m=-n}^{n}|(f,e_m)|^{2}<\infty. Thus |(f,e_m)|^2 \to 0 so |(f,e_m)|\to 0 and whence (f,e_m)\to 0, as required.

Does this work?
 
Kindayr said:
Yep we have. Could I say that:

Since \{e_n\} is complete it follows that f=\lim_{n\to\infty} \sum_{m=-n}^{n}(f,e_m)e_m. Thus, the latter sum converges and hence \lim_{n\to\infty}\sum_{m=-n}^{n}|(f,e_m)|^{2}<\infty. Thus |(f,e_m)|^2 \to 0 so |(f,e_m)|\to 0 and whence (f,e_m)\to 0, as required.

Does this work?

You don't really need \{e_n\} to be complete for that. Bessel's inequality works fine.
Also, the limit you mention is L^2-convergence. You might want to be careful with that.
 
micromass said:
You don't really need \{e_n\} to be complete for that. Bessel's inequality works fine.
Also, the limit you mention is L^2-convergence. You might want to be careful with that.

What should I be careful with? Does L^2-convergence not imply absolute convergence? Sorry, just a little confused by your statement.
 
What if I re-index so that n\in \mathbb{N} so that d_0=e_0, d_1=e_1, d_2=e_{-1},\dots. Then by Bessel's inequality we have \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}|(f,d_n)|^2\le \parallel f\parallel ^{2}<\infty. Hence \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}|(f,d_n)|^2 converges absolutely and whence (f,d_n)\to 0 and thus (f,e_n)\to\ 0 as |n|\to\infty.

Would this be better?

I'm far from an analyst as you can probably tell hahahah.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K