Convergence of $\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\left(\frac{z}{z+1}\right)^n (z\in C)

  • Thread starter Thread starter fauboca
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convergence
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence of the series $\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\left(\frac{z}{z+1}\right)^n$ where $z$ is a complex number. Participants are exploring the conditions under which this series converges, particularly focusing on the implications of the ratio test and the geometric interpretation of inequalities involving complex numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the convergence criteria for the series, questioning the validity of the original poster's assertion regarding $z > -1/2$. They discuss the application of the ratio test and the implications of the inequality $\left|\frac{z}{z+1}\right| < 1$. There is also a focus on the geometric interpretation of the inequality $|z| < |z + 1|$.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on how to manipulate inequalities and explore geometric interpretations. There is a lack of consensus on the correct approach to the problem, and multiple interpretations of the conditions for convergence are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of working with complex numbers and the implications of squaring inequalities. There are references to the need for clarity in definitions and assumptions, particularly regarding the properties of complex conjugates.

fauboca
Messages
157
Reaction score
0
[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\left(\frac{z}{z+1}\right)^n[/tex]

z in C.

This only converges for [itex]z>\frac{-1}{2}[/itex], correct?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


No. For one thing, z is complex, so it doesn't make sense to say z > -1/2. In any case, show us how you reached this conclusion.
 


vela said:
No. For one thing, z is complex, so it doesn't make sense to say z > -1/2. In any case, show us how you reached this conclusion.

Ratio Test
 


You need to explain what you did in more detail.
 


vela said:
You need to explain what you did in more detail.

By the ratio test,

[tex]\left|\frac{z}{z+1}\right|<1[/tex]

Is this correct now?

If so, how do I find the appropriate z for which it converges?
 


Your inequality is true if and only if

[tex]\left|\frac{z}{z+1}\right|^2 < 1[/tex]

You can rearrange this and simplify to find a simple inequality for z.

Another way: your inequality is true if and only if

|z| < |z + 1|

which can be written more suggestively as

|z - 0| < |z + 1|

What does this mean geometrically?
 


jbunniii said:
Your inequality is true if and only if

[tex]\left|\frac{z}{z+1}\right|^2 < 1[/tex]

You can rearrange this and simplify to find a simple inequality for z.

Another way: your inequality is true if and only if

|z| < |z + 1|

What does this mean geometrically?

Why did you square it?
 


fauboca said:
Why did you square it?

Because you can then simplify [itex]|z + 1|^2[/itex]. If you're not sure how, try writing it as z + 1 times its complex conjugate.
 


jbunniii said:
Because you can then simplify [itex]|z + 1|^2[/itex]. If you're not sure how, try writing it as z + 1 times its complex conjugate.

I don't understand what you mean.

z + 1 times it conjugate is

[tex]z^2 - 1[/tex]
 
  • #10


fauboca said:
I don't understand what you mean.

z + 1 times it conjugate is

[tex]z^2 - 1[/tex]

No, that's z + 1 times z - 1. The conjugate of z + 1 is not z - 1.
 
  • #11


jbunniii said:
No, that's z + 1 times z - 1. The conjugate of z + 1 is not z - 1.

So am I supposed to get [itex]\bar{z}> -1[/itex]??
 
  • #12


fauboca said:
So am I supposed to get [itex]\bar{z}> -1[/itex]??

No. That doesn't even make any sense, as [itex]\bar{z}[/itex] is a complex number.

[tex]|z+1|^2 = (z+1)(\overline{z + 1}) = (z + 1)(\bar{z} + 1) = z\bar{z} + z + \bar{z} + 1 = |z|^2 + z + \bar{z} + 1[/tex]

So what does your inequality become?

Hint: you can simplify [itex]z + \bar{z}[/itex].
 
  • #13


jbunniii said:
No. That doesn't even make any sense, as [itex]\bar{z}[/itex] is a complex number.

[tex]|z+1|^2 = (z+1)(\overline{z + 1}) = (z + 1)(\bar{z} + 1) = z\bar{z} + z + \bar{z} + 1 = |z|^2 + z + \bar{z} + 1[/tex]

So what does your inequality become?

Hint: you can simplify [itex]z + \bar{z}[/itex].

I defined [itex]z = x + yi[/itex] and then did what you said. But we had [itex]|z| < |z+1|[/itex] That is how I obtained my solution.
 
  • #14


fauboca said:
I defined [itex]z = x + yi[/itex] and then did what you said. But we had [itex]|z| < |z+1|[/itex] That is how I obtained my solution.

But you didn't obtain a correct solution, or at least you haven't posted it here.

OK, forget the squaring for now and let's focus on this inequality:

|z| < |z + 1|

What does this mean geometrically?

I will write it more suggestively as follows:

|z - 0| < |z - (-1)|

What values of z satisfy this inequality? It's a certain region of the complex plane. What region?

This kind of thing is often easier to answer if you first determine what region is specified by the EQUALITY:

|z - 0| = |z - (-1)|
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K