Convergent Sequences and Functions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the existence of a unique fixed point for a function f:ℝ→ℝ that satisfies the contraction condition |f(x)-f(y)| ≤ c|x-y| for a constant 0 PREREQUISITES

  • Understanding of contraction mappings and fixed point theorems
  • Familiarity with Cauchy sequences in real analysis
  • Knowledge of recursive sequences and their convergence properties
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical proofs and inequalities
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Banach Fixed Point Theorem and its applications
  • Learn about Cauchy sequences and their convergence criteria
  • Explore examples of contraction mappings in real analysis
  • Investigate the uniqueness of fixed points in iterative methods
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of real analysis, and anyone interested in understanding fixed point theorems and their implications in mathematical functions.

zbr
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hello all, I am having trouble with a convergent series problem.

The problem statement:

Let f:ℝ→ℝ be a function such that there exists a constant 0<c<1 for which:
|f(x)-f(y)| ≤c|x-y|
for every x,y in ℝ. Prove that there exists a unique a in ℝ such that f(a) = a.

There is a provided hint:
Consider a sequence {x(n)} defined recurrently by x(n+1) = f(x(n)). Prove that it converges and its limit a satisfies f(a) = a.

My confusion is how to show that the recursive function converges and satisfies the required limit. Should I use a specific function f?

I am fairly certain that we need to show that this sequence (defined in the hint section) is Cauchy. This is what I have so far:

Consider the sequence:
x1 = f(0)
x2 = f(x1)
x3 = f(x2)
...
x(n+1) = f(xn)

Now let us take |xn-xm|:
|xn-xm| = (f(x(n-1)) - f(x(m-1))) < c|x(n-1) - x(m-1)|

However, here I don't know how to pick N sch that for every e>0:
c|x(n-1) - x(m-1)|<e for every n,m>= N (i.e. the definition of a cauchy sequence)Thanks in advance for all help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
| x_2 - x_1 | &lt; c | x_1 - x_0 |. | x_3 - x_2 | &lt; c^2 | x_1 - x_0|. | x_4 - x_3 | &lt; c^3 | x_1 - x_0 |. Etc etc. Take that for a hint and see what you can do with it. Once you've show it's Cauchy and defines a fixed point prove there aren't two fixed points.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K