Convergent Series: sin(kx)/ln(k)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ForMyThunder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convergent Series
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence of the series \(\sum^{\infty}_{k=2}\frac{\sin(kx)}{\ln(k)}\) for all real \(x\). Participants are exploring the implications of the behavior of the sine function and logarithmic terms in the context of series convergence.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the boundedness of the series and the application of Dirichlet's Test. There are questions about the convergence of \(\sin(kx)\) and its implications for the series. Some participants examine the number of terms contributing to the sum and the conditions under which the partial sums of \(\sin(kx)\) might remain bounded.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing with various interpretations being explored. Some participants suggest that the series may converge based on boundedness arguments, while others raise concerns about the behavior of \(\sin(kx)\) and its impact on convergence. References to external materials have been provided for further clarification.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the behavior of \(\sin(kx)\) depending on whether \(x\) is a rational multiple of \(2\pi\), indicating that this may affect the boundedness of the series. Participants are also considering the implications of the logarithmic term in the series.

ForMyThunder
Messages
149
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Is this series convergent for all real x:

[tex]\sum[/tex][tex]^{\infty}_{k=2}[/tex][tex]\frac{sin(kx)}{ln(k)}[/tex]

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



This series is less than

[tex]\frac{1}{ln(2)}[/tex][tex]\sum[/tex][tex]^{\infty}_{k=2}[/tex]sin(kx)

which is less than [tex]\frac{\pi}{x ln2}[/tex]. So, the series is bounded for all x. I'm thinking that the Dirichlet Test would show that this series converges.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Er, but sin(kx) doesn't converge to zero as k goes to infinity.
 
But the sum of the sin(kx) would still be bounded, right?

If you mean the sum of sin(kx), I found that it was less than 2pi/x in this way:

Consider the interval [0,2pi] with x in this interval. Then there are at most 2pi/x terms, with some of them being < 0. Since sin(y) <= 1 for all y, we have that the sum of the |sin(kx)| < 2pi/x.

Since the partial sums of sin(kx) is bounded and 1/ln(k) is a nonincreasing nullsequence, would this mean that the the series converges by Dirichlet's Test?
 
Last edited:
Then there are at most 2pi/x terms
The sum you wrote is over all k, not just those k for which [itex]0 \leq kx \leq 2\pi[/itex].



If x is not a rational multiple of 2pi, I'm not sure if I expect the sequence of partial sums of sin(kx) to be bounded or not. But if that sequence is bounded, then your argument is valid.
 
Take a look at Example 1, under corollary 6, in this PDF: http://people.oregonstate.edu/~peterseb/mth311/docs/311abel.pdf

And yes you're right, [tex]\sum sin(kx)[/tex] is bounded.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K