Convergent Series: sin(kx)/ln(k)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ForMyThunder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convergent Series
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 3K views
ForMyThunder
Messages
149
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Is this series convergent for all real x:

[tex]\sum[/tex][tex]^{\infty}_{k=2}[/tex][tex]\frac{sin(kx)}{ln(k)}[/tex]

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



This series is less than

[tex]\frac{1}{ln(2)}[/tex][tex]\sum[/tex][tex]^{\infty}_{k=2}[/tex]sin(kx)

which is less than [tex]\frac{\pi}{x ln2}[/tex]. So, the series is bounded for all x. I'm thinking that the Dirichlet Test would show that this series converges.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
But the sum of the sin(kx) would still be bounded, right?

If you mean the sum of sin(kx), I found that it was less than 2pi/x in this way:

Consider the interval [0,2pi] with x in this interval. Then there are at most 2pi/x terms, with some of them being < 0. Since sin(y) <= 1 for all y, we have that the sum of the |sin(kx)| < 2pi/x.

Since the partial sums of sin(kx) is bounded and 1/ln(k) is a nonincreasing nullsequence, would this mean that the the series converges by Dirichlet's Test?
 
Last edited:
Then there are at most 2pi/x terms
The sum you wrote is over all k, not just those k for which [itex]0 \leq kx \leq 2\pi[/itex].



If x is not a rational multiple of 2pi, I'm not sure if I expect the sequence of partial sums of sin(kx) to be bounded or not. But if that sequence is bounded, then your argument is valid.
 
Take a look at Example 1, under corollary 6, in this PDF: http://people.oregonstate.edu/~peterseb/mth311/docs/311abel.pdf

And yes you're right, [tex]\sum sin(kx)[/tex] is bounded.
 
Last edited by a moderator: