Conversations with God: George Felos & Estelle Browning

  • Thread starter Thread starter Grace
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around George Felos's book "Litigations as Spiritual Practice," where he reflects on his experiences as an attorney, notably in the Terri Schiavo case. Felos describes a profound moment witnessing Schiavo, claiming she appeared peaceful and beautiful, which some participants found unsettling. The conversation shifts to skepticism about claims of spiritual experiences and conversations with God, questioning the validity of such perceptions. Participants express differing views on the existence of God and the nature of spiritual experiences, with some referencing literature on the dying process that suggests a unique understanding of death among medical professionals. The dialogue also touches on the characterization of Felos and the Schindler family, with critiques of perceived fanaticism in their beliefs. Overall, the thread explores the intersection of spirituality, law, and personal belief in the context of a highly publicized legal battle.
Grace
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Has anyone read the book Litigations as Spiritual Practice by Attorney George Felos, he is Michael Schiavo's lawyer who has now achieved a singular landmark achievement of having a case successfully withstanding the review by over several dozen state and federal courts over a 7-year period. Standing in front of a huge press of reporters, the attorney apparently said last Saturday, "Frankly when I saw her... she looked beautiful. In all the years I've seen Mrs. Schiavo, I've never seen such a look of peace and beauty upon her." According to James Tarantano (Source), this is "the creepiest moment in the Terri Schiavo saga" and goes on to point out a book that George Felos wrote in 2002, entitled " ."

"In that book, Felos describes his contact with Estelle Browning, his first right-to-die case, and how he "sensed her soul in agony" and how his soul touched her as he stood next to her in her nursing home bed.

I don't believe that we can prove or disprove there is a God. I'm wondering how he can have a conversation with God and "sense her soul in agony?"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Willful blindness and Wishfull thinking.
 
Smurf said:
Willful blindness and Wishfull thinking.
As much as it galls me to agree with you :wink: , that sums it up just about perfectly.
 
haha, i am wondering the same abuot what is the proof when dose ppl claim they spoke with God.

God messengers and prophets are another story, [well, if X show a miracle that God spoke to him , so that be it] And whether we can prove God or no is another story too, I have a logical proof that God do exist. However, i don't want to kill this thread!

[Well, if some one willing ot open a thread abuot it, i might go and share]

>End of my two pennys<
 
I'm sorry but since you've said I want to know your proof.
You may as well if you have the time.
And I'm sure most people won't care.
It definitely won't kill the thread I don't think.
I just have two words for you COME ON...COME ON ;)
 
Smurf said:
Willful blindness and Wishfull thinking.


QF bloody E.
 
Maybe the agonized comatose give off a smell that affects one's subconscious. Chemical cues, like the way the sick smell sick.

Or maybe it is wishful thinking on his part.
 
I have mentioned this before and found a link once, but there was a very interesting book written primarily by an aids hospice nurse, with contributions from over a dozen other hospice workers - doctors, RNs, LVNs, etc. The thesis of the book was that "you don't want to miss your own death"; ie. the dying process. The experiences described by these medical workers was nothing short of staggering and quite inspirational - in much the same light as discussed here, and much, much more. I don't remember the name of that book in particular, but when looking for it I found many others much like it. It seems that you won't find many athiests among the world's foremost experts on death.
 
Last edited:
Ivan Seeking said:
It seems that you won't find many athiests among the world's foremost experts on death.
Nor physicists... :rolleyes:
 
  • #10
franznietzsche said:
QF bloody E.
What the bloody hell does that mean?
 
  • #11
Danger said:
Nor physicists... :rolleyes:

The hell you talking about willis?

Physicists are predominately non-religious. Among NSF members i think it was 10% believed in God.
 
  • #12
Smurf said:
What the bloody hell does that mean?


QFE = Quoted For Emphasis
 
  • #13
Danger said:
Nor physicists... :rolleyes:

Sorry? How many mornings make a purple you say?
 
  • #14
I tried to have a conversation with God once..he told me to shut-up cause there were people with real problems out there..kinda made me feel better.
 
  • #15
franznietzsche said:
The hell you talking about willis?

Physicists are predominately non-religious. Among NSF members i think it was 10% believed in God.
That's what I meant. If the majority of death experts aren't atheists, then obviously the majority are not hard scientists. They're most likely sociologists, psychologists, clergy, mercenaries...

Ivan Seeking said:
Sorry? How many mornings make a purple you say?
You're confused, son. I take the blue one in the morning. (I'm too busy with you weirdos at night.) :-p
 
  • #16
In http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/pfeiffer200503301030.asp yesterday, Eric Pfeiffer said it very succinctly
This is all not to say that Felos isn't entitled to believe whatever he wants to. He, of course, is. However, this is the same man who has described the Schindler family and their supporters as "fanatics." It's a belief many in the media have reciprocated in their analysis of what drives the Schindler's fight for Terri's survival. But, really, who's three sheets to the moonbeam?
I must admit I have not seen the phrase "three sheets to the moonbeam" although I can guess what it means. The term "three sheets to the wind" means to be drunk (Source):
To be "three sheets to the wind" is to be drunk. The sheet is the line that controls the sails on a ship. If the line is not secured, the sail flops in the wind, and the ship loses headway and control. If all three sails are loose, the ship is out of control.
The first written example of this salty saying apparently comes from "that recorder of low life, Pierce Egan, in his Real life in London of 1821. But it must surely be much older." (Source). Presumably, "three sheets to the moonbeam" is more than very drunk but suffering from drunken delusions. http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry/00315361?single=1&query_type=word&queryword=moonbeam&first=1&max_to_show=10 does not contain any references to "three sheets to the moonbeam" although it cites Shakespeare, "To fanne the Moone-beames from his sleeping eyes". So, I must conclude that the Schiavo case is giving rise to new poetic aspirations.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #17
Grace said:
The term "three sheets to the wind" means to be drunk
An everyday turn of phrase for us Canuks, although more prevailent in the Maritimes. We also refer to it as 'half-seas over'. :smile:
 

Similar threads

Back
Top