Python Convert a FOR loop to parallel processes

Click For Summary
Python's parallel programming capabilities can enhance performance, particularly for independent tasks like those in a for loop. The original poster seeks to optimize a simple loop that processes independent values using a function. While parallel processing is one option, discussions emphasize that Python's inherent overhead can significantly slow execution compared to languages like C++. Techniques such as vectorization with NumPy can yield substantial speed improvements—up to 100x—by minimizing interpreter involvement and leveraging optimized C-based libraries.The conversation highlights that using C++ can dramatically reduce execution time, with one user reporting a 30x speed increase over Python for similar tasks. C++ allows for more efficient memory management and execution, especially with modern compilers that support auto-vectorization and multithreading. However, the complexity of C++ programming is acknowledged, suggesting that users familiar with Python may find it challenging.The discussion also touches on the importance of understanding CPU architecture, particularly how modern multicore processors can handle multiple threads simultaneously, thus enhancing performance for independent tasks.
  • #31
willem2 said:
The cpu can have dozens of instructions waiting for other instructions or memory in the pipeline at the same time. The cpu will have no problems starting a multiply, a subtraction, a load (2 loads for the newest types) and a store in one clock cycle, even if these belong to different iterations of the loop.
EngWiPy said:
OK, I see. But we have no control over this. I mean this is a hardware design architecture how the CPU executes different instructions, because they are done at different units. But what if you are executing the same function on independent data, but using the same instructions?
We have some control over this, which is what optimizations using loop unrolling or loop unwinding are about.
The processor executes instructions in one or more pipelines, and tries to guess what the next instruction will be. If it guesses correctly, everything is fine, since that instruction is in the pipeline. If it guesses wrong, it has to flush the pipeline, which takes several clock cycles to refill.

Loops such as for or while loops can be problematic, as are branches such as if and if ... else.

Here's a simple example from this wiki article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loop_unrolling
C:
int x;
for (x = 0; x < 100; x++)
{
     delete(x);
}

The same loop, after unrolling:
C:
int x;
for (x = 0; x < 100; x += 5 )
{
     delete(x);
     delete(x + 1);
     delete(x + 2);
     delete(x + 3);
     delete(x + 4);
}
 
Technology news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
821
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K