MHB Convert polar equation sec(theta)=2 to rectangular equation

Elissa89
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
My professor gave us a study guide with the solutions:

The equation is:

sec(theta)=2

I am supposed to convert it to a rectangular equation. I know the answer is going to be y^2-3(x)^2=0

I don't know how to get to the answer he gave us.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Elissa89 said:
My professor gave us a study guide with the solutions:

The equation is:

sec(theta)=2

I am supposed to convert it to a rectangular equation. I know the answer is going to be y^2-3(x)^2=0

I don't know how to get to the answer he gave us.

note that $x = r\cos{\theta}$ and $r=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}$ ...$\sec{\theta} = \dfrac{1}{\cos{\theta}} = 2 \implies \cos{\theta}=\dfrac{1}{2}$

multiply both sides by $r$ ...

$r\cos{\theta} = \dfrac{r}{2} \implies x = \dfrac{\sqrt{x^2+y^2}}{2} \implies x^2 = \dfrac{x^2+y^2}{4}$$4x^2 = x^2+y^2 \implies y^2 - 3x^2 = 0$
 
skeeter said:
note that $x = r\cos{\theta}$ and $r=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}$ ...$\sec{\theta} = \dfrac{1}{\cos{\theta}} = 2 \implies \cos{\theta}=\dfrac{1}{2}$

multiply both sides by $r$ ...

$r\cos{\theta} = \dfrac{r}{2} \implies x = \dfrac{\sqrt{x^2+y^2}}{2} \implies x^2 = \dfrac{x^2+y^2}{4}$$4x^2 = x^2+y^2 \implies y^2 - 3x^2 = 0$

*Sigh* It's always so obvious when someone shows me the steps but I have the hardest time figuring it out on my own. thanks
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top