MHB Convert polar equation sec(theta)=2 to rectangular equation

AI Thread Summary
To convert the polar equation sec(theta) = 2 to a rectangular equation, start by recognizing that sec(theta) is the reciprocal of cos(theta), leading to cos(theta) = 1/2. By using the relationships x = r*cos(theta) and r = √(x²+y²), multiply both sides by r to derive x = r/2. This results in the equation 4x² = x² + y², which simplifies to y² - 3x² = 0. Understanding these steps can clarify the conversion process from polar to rectangular coordinates.
Elissa89
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
My professor gave us a study guide with the solutions:

The equation is:

sec(theta)=2

I am supposed to convert it to a rectangular equation. I know the answer is going to be y^2-3(x)^2=0

I don't know how to get to the answer he gave us.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Elissa89 said:
My professor gave us a study guide with the solutions:

The equation is:

sec(theta)=2

I am supposed to convert it to a rectangular equation. I know the answer is going to be y^2-3(x)^2=0

I don't know how to get to the answer he gave us.

note that $x = r\cos{\theta}$ and $r=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}$ ...$\sec{\theta} = \dfrac{1}{\cos{\theta}} = 2 \implies \cos{\theta}=\dfrac{1}{2}$

multiply both sides by $r$ ...

$r\cos{\theta} = \dfrac{r}{2} \implies x = \dfrac{\sqrt{x^2+y^2}}{2} \implies x^2 = \dfrac{x^2+y^2}{4}$$4x^2 = x^2+y^2 \implies y^2 - 3x^2 = 0$
 
skeeter said:
note that $x = r\cos{\theta}$ and $r=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}$ ...$\sec{\theta} = \dfrac{1}{\cos{\theta}} = 2 \implies \cos{\theta}=\dfrac{1}{2}$

multiply both sides by $r$ ...

$r\cos{\theta} = \dfrac{r}{2} \implies x = \dfrac{\sqrt{x^2+y^2}}{2} \implies x^2 = \dfrac{x^2+y^2}{4}$$4x^2 = x^2+y^2 \implies y^2 - 3x^2 = 0$

*Sigh* It's always so obvious when someone shows me the steps but I have the hardest time figuring it out on my own. thanks
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top