Converting Effective Mechanical Load to Newtons (Capybara)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the number of capybaras needed to overcome a frictional force of approximately 125,000N, given their effective mechanical advantage (EMA) of 0.71 and mass of 55kg. A participant seeks clarification on how to convert EMA into force output in Newtons, noting that a previous source indicated a force output of around 700N per capybara. They express confusion about rearranging the EMA formula to find the force of effort. Additionally, there is a reminder to keep related discussions within the same thread for clarity and to define terms like EMA for better understanding. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clear communication and proper calculations in mechanical load discussions.
enigmaticbacon
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
I have the EMA of the average capybara, and I'm trying to figure out the maximum force one can exert given that EMA.
Hello again!
I've found the capybara's EMA to be 0.71. Their mass to be 55kg. And their average speed to be ~3.0km/h.

I want to figure out how many capybaras it would take to overcome Friction * Normal force of ~125,000N. How would I go about doing that?

https://www.quora.com/How-many-capy...wheeled-chariot-across-the-Bolivian-altiplano

The answer of a Quora question states:
EMA of a capybara is around 0.7. That would give us a force output of around 700N.

But I have no idea how they converted from EMA to a force output in Newtons. Can anyone help me?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I know that EMA is = Fload/Feffort

I thought I could rearrange the variables to solve for the Force of Effort. But that obviously didn't work. A capybara cannot pull 88750N.
 
Don't you already have a thread going on this set of questions?
 
I do, but I figured out some stuff since and it felt like a different question? I assumed for a different question, I'd make a different post :) Sorry, new to this forum.
 
No worries. Please keep this discussion in your original thread. Otherwise it gets too confusing and fragmented for others to keep up. Thanks. :smile:
 
Oh, and please define the acronym EMA unless it's obvious in your other thread (I don't remember), and if EMA has units, please include those. Thanks. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes enigmaticbacon
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top