Converting metric to imperial (12in/1ft)^3

  • Thread starter Thread starter C3ss4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Imperial Metric
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conversion of units from metric to imperial, specifically focusing on the conversion of mass flow rate and volume from grams per minute and cubic meters to pounds mass per hour and cubic feet. Participants explore the validity of a conversion method presented in a textbook, particularly the use of the factor (12in/1ft)^3 to cancel out cubic meters.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a conversion method for mass flow rate and volume, questioning the use of (12in/1ft)^3 for cancelling out m^3.
  • Another participant suggests the possibility of an error in the textbook, proposing that "in" may have been mistakenly used instead of "m".
  • A later reply clarifies that since 12in = 1ft, the factor (12in/1ft) can be treated as 1, allowing for unit cancellation.
  • Another participant provides a computational evaluation of the conversion using a program called Calchemy, asserting that their calculation aligns with their initial understanding.
  • Participants discuss the utility of the Calchemy program for performing unit conversions and dimensional analysis without manual calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the correctness of the textbook's method. Some participants believe the book is incorrect, while others provide reasoning that supports the validity of the conversion method. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the accuracy of the textbook's solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the textbook's accuracy and the implications of unit conversion factors. There is a lack of clarity on whether the conversion presented in the book is appropriate or if it contains errors.

C3ss4
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello. I am new to engineering and to imperial units, and currently learning by doing some exercises. I'm stuck on the following conversion:

  • 0.04 g / min x m^3 -> lbm / hr x ft^3
    I figured it like this:
  • 0.04 g / min x m^3 x (60min/1hr) x (1m/35,314)^3 x (1 lbm / 454g) =
    1,49x10^-4 lbm / ft^3 x hr

However, the author of the book gives the following solution:

  • 0.04 g / min x m^3 x (60min/1hr) x (12in/1ft)^3 x (1 lbm / 454g) =
    9.14 lbm / ft^3 x hr

It really lost me, why (12in/1ft)^3 its supposed to cancel out m^3? He does the same on a similar exercise converting cm^2 with (12in/1ft)^2.

Thanks for your time and help.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Looks like the book has got it wrong.
Maybe there was a typo or OCR error where "in" became "m".

What book? what author? have you checked the web for an errata ?
 
Not yet, but i will check. I was also thinking than the book might be wrong because really made no sense.

Thanks for your help :)
 
Found new information:

Since 12in = 1ft, you can get a one by dividing both sides of the equation by 1ft, giving 12in / 1ft= 1. Because the result is 1, and the units can cancel out it makes sense after all.
 
Last edited:
You were right the first time, the book has it wrong (yes, it does happen sometimes).
You can evaluate the equation directly using a program called calchemy. Here is it's "evaluation" of the equation:

0.04 g / min m^3 ? lbm / hr ft^3
(0.04 * gramm) / (minute * [meter^3]) ? poundm / (hour * [foot^3])
= 0.00014982723 lbm / hr ft^3

The program runs on iPhone, but there is a "web" version at:
http://www.testardi.com/rich/calchemy2/
that you can use for free, just cut and paste the equation above to give it a try (first line)
The second line shows the equation it "actually" evaluated (sort of "in longhand"), the third line is the answer.

Another web instance used to "work" at
http://www.calchemy.com
but that instance was broken by the service provider because of "security concerns" and has not been fixed... Still, there is a lot of good information about the program on the site.

The program carries units with the numbers, so you don't ever have to do any conversions "by hand". It takes a little getting used to, but once you get the hang of it you can calculate all kinds of things really easy. The syntax is "what you know, with units of measure" ? "units you want the result in"
It will even "solve" by dimensional analysis, it can do this because it knows what answer (units) you are looking for!
 
My, that looks really useful for learning. I'll give it a try!

Thanks a lot: :)
 
It is sort of working at http://www.calchemy.com
At least the answers are right, but the UI is still kind of messed up, the answer should be printed at the bottom, not in another page...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K