Converting source intensity to the maximum reach of beam flux

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum distance for achieving 5 lux illumination using the equation E = 10.76*(35,000/d^2). It is noted that the calculated distance of 275 feet is incorrect, as the 35,000 candela value is not an axial intensity but rather measured at a specific angle relative to the lamp's axes. A right triangle setup is suggested for the calculation, but it is pointed out that the absence of the lamp's mounting height makes the problem unsolvable as stated. The equation does not incorporate mounting height, which is crucial for accurate distance determination. Accurate calculations require all relevant parameters, including mounting height, to be specified.
Qube
Gold Member
Messages
461
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Consider a headlamp that is measured to have an intensity of 35,000 candela at FMVSS 108 test point 1.5D, 2R. That is, 1.5 degrees below the horizontal axis and 2 degrees right of the vertical axis with respect to the lamp. On a completely unlit road, what is the maximum distance at which there is 5 lux illumination?
Relevant Equations
E = 10.76*(I/d^2)
We can solve for the maximum 5 lux illumination distance with the above equation.

E = 10.76*(35,000/d^2)

d = 275 feet (approximately).

However, the 5 lux illumination distance is not 275 feet. The 35,000 cd value is not an axial intensity value. It is at a point that is slightly down and to the right with regard to the intersection of the lamp's horizontal and vertical axes (H-V).

Therefore, we have to set up a right triangle as such:

IMG_20190727_171557.jpg


Is this the correct setup? Note that we cannot solve this problem as stated, since no mounting height of the lamp is given.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, this is not the correct setup. The equation given is E=10.76*(35000/d^2), where E is the lux illumination and d is the distance from the lamp. There is no mention of mounting height in the equation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
5K