Hi everyone. I'll describe my setup first, then state my question.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I have a receiver chain consisting of the following (where all conversion factors are assumed to be scalar and constant under the conditions in which I use them):

1) An APD (avalanche photodiode): Input: Optical power P1in [W]; Output: Current I1out [A]; Conversion factor: C1 [A/W].

2) A transimpedance amplifier: Input: Current I2in = I1out [A]; Output: Voltage U2out [V]; Conversion factor: C2 [V/A = ohm].

3) A monolithic high-frequency amplifier, 50 ohm differential input. (~50 ohm resistor connected across the amplifier inputs, negative input is AC-coupled to GND, positive input is AC-coupled to the transimpedance amplifier output.) Use Z0 = 50 ohm. Input: P3in [dBm]; Output: P3out [dBm]. Gain factor is C3 [dB].

My question is: How should I convert the input optical power to an electrical power, at the input of component 3) above? (Or more specifically, how do I convert U2out to P3in?)

I want to use power expressed as dBm when making the necessary calculations, since I will treat the receiver as a RF system. For example, the amplifier gain is expressed in dB.

Assume I have the input optical power and all conversion factors, no point in confusing the argument with a bunch of numbers.

**************************

My thoughts on the matter are as follows:

I am confident that the output from the transimpedance amplifier is U2out = P1in * C1 * C2, and the units seem to be correct.

But the only way I can think of to convert U2out to P3in is to take P3in = (U2out)^2 / Z0.

I have a gut feeling that this is incorrect, since (look at the formulas) this means that the original input power is squared. In my case this is a problem since the required dynamic range of the system, when calculated at the input (the APD), is _half_ of the dynamic range when calculated at the 3:rd component.

Since I do not care about the DC components of U2out, the Z0 resistor seems to be where the voltage drop occurs (but I suspect I should treat the differential input of the 3:rd component as a parallel connection of the external matching resistor and the input impedance, but that would only introduce a factor of 2 in the calculations).

I can't find the error. I suspect the root cause is in the C1 conversion factor, [A/W].

Can anyone please point me in the right direction? Or if I am already pointed in the right direction, tell me why? ;-)

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Converting voltage to power in a receiver

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**