Convolution of two delta functions in frequency domain

Click For Summary
The convolution of two delta functions in the frequency domain demonstrates that the resulting function combines the frequency shifts of the delta functions involved. Specifically, convolving [δ(ω-π) - δ(ω+π)] with (δ(ω+50π) - δ(ω-50π)) yields δ(ω+49π) - δ(ω-51π) - δ(ω+51π) + δ(ω-49π). This result can be understood through the distributive property of convolution and the frequency shifts that occur during the process. Utilizing Laplace transforms simplifies the computation by allowing for easier manipulation of frequency information. Understanding these principles is crucial for grasping the behavior of delta functions in convolution, especially in preparation for exams.
atrus_ovis
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
Apparently, when convolving, for example:

[δ(ω-π) - δ(ω+π)] * (δ(ω+50π)-δ(ω-50π))

the result is
δ(ω+49π)-δ(ω-51π)-δ(ω+51π)+δ(ω-49π)

where δ() is the Dirac delta function, * the convolution operator and ω the frequency variable

How do we get to this? Can you help me on the intuition in this example and/or general in convolution in the frequency domain?

thank you.edit: i think i understand that we use the distributivity property to expand it.When we have , i.e. δ(ω+π) * δ(ω-50π) how do we continue?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
atrus_ovis said:
Apparently, when convolving, for example:

[δ(ω-π) - δ(ω+π)] * (δ(ω+50π)-δ(ω-50π))

the result is
δ(ω+49π)-δ(ω-51π)-δ(ω+51π)+δ(ω-49π)

where δ() is the Dirac delta function, * the convolution operator and ω the frequency variable

How do we get to this? Can you help me on the intuition in this example and/or general in convolution in the frequency domain?

thank you.


edit: i think i understand that we use the distributivity property to expand it.When we have , i.e. δ(ω+π) * δ(ω-50π) how do we continue?

In terms of actually computing the convolution, you can use Laplace transforms to get the "frequency information" of both terms, and then use the inverse Laplace Transform to get the actual result. With convolutions you just work out the Laplace transforms of T1, and T2 (in T1 * T2) and then use it in the way that was said above.

You could alternatively do it just with the actual definition though, but that would require a different approach. The Laplace way is a lot easier.

Do you know about Laplace transforms?

What have you tried so far? Maybe you should show some working or any ideas you had or tried that failed.
 
The course I'm on doesn't include Laplace transforms, so i guess it's not the expected way.

The equation I've written is part of a solved problem set, and I'm trying to actually understand why this result is correct because I'm preparing for my exams.
I know the rule about homework.I have the solution, I'm only asking for tips to understand it.

In the time domain, it's ok. f(x) convolved with δ(x-k) yields f(k) , as the delta function is 0 everywhere but k.
In the frequency domain, it seems that the frequency offset of the delta function, is simply added as an offset to the convolving pair.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
12K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K