Coordinate transformation and metric tensor

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the transformation of the four-dimensional metric tensor, which has ten independent components. It highlights the freedom to choose four components almost arbitrarily through coordinate transformations. However, achieving a specific form of the metric globally is generally impossible for arbitrary metrics, as demonstrated by examples like the Godel universe, which exhibits rotational properties that cannot be eliminated by coordinate changes. While local transformations can simplify the metric in neighborhoods of points, a global transformation to a special form is often not feasible. The conversation emphasizes the limitations of metric transformations in general relativity, particularly in four dimensions.
archipatelin
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
General four-dimensional (symmetric) metric tensor has 10 algebraic independent components.

But transformation of coordinates allows choose four components of metric tensor almost arbitrarily.

My question is how much freedom is in choose this components?

Do exist for most general metric any coordinates transformation
g_{\mu\nu}(x)\rightarrow\tilde{g}_{\mu\nu}(\tilde{x}) which transforming matric to new form?


<br /> \[ \left( \begin{array}{cccc}<br /> -1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; \tilde{g}11 &amp; \tilde{g}12 &amp; \tilde{g}13\\<br /> 0 &amp; \tilde{g}12 &amp; \tilde{g}22 &amp; \tilde{g}23\\<br /> 0 &amp; \tilde{g}13 &amp; \tilde{g}23 &amp; \tilde{g}33 \end{array} \right)\]<br />

Or​

<br /> \[ \left( \begin{array}{cccc}<br /> -1 &amp; \tilde{g}01 &amp; \tilde{g}02 &amp; \tilde{g}02 \\<br /> \tilde{g}01 &amp; \tilde{g}11 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> \tilde{g}02 &amp; 0 &amp; \tilde{g}22 &amp; 0\\<br /> \tilde{g}03 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; \tilde{g}33 \end{array} \right)\]<br />
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you want it to have this form at a particular point, or globally?

If all you want is a particular point, then you can always put it in the form diag(-1,1,1,1). This is guaranteed by the equivalence principle.

If you want this to happen globally, then I'm pretty sure it's impossible, for an arbitrary given metric. For example, I think the first form you gave has no rotation, but spacetimes like the Godel universe have rotation that you can't get rid of by a change of coordinates.
 
bcrowell said:
Do you want it to have this form at a particular point, or globally?
I mean globally transformation.

I know that the general two-dimensional metric can be transformed into the orthogonal traceless form

<br /> \[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> g_{00}(t,x) &amp; g_{01}(t,x) \\<br /> g_{01}(t,x) &amp; g_{11}(t,x) \end{array} \right)\rightarrow<br /> \left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> h(\tau,\chi) &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; -h(\tau,\chi) \end{array} \right).<br /> \] <br />​

What can we say about the transformation coordinates for general four-dimensional metric?
 
Last edited:
archipatelin said:
I mean globally transformation.

I know that the general two-dimensional metric can be transformed into the orthogonal traceless form

<br /> \[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> g_{00}(t,x) &amp; g_{01}(t,x) \\<br /> g_{01}(t,x) &amp; g_{11}(t,x) \end{array} \right)\rightarrow<br /> \left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> h(\tau,\chi) &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; -h(\tau,\chi) \end{array} \right).<br /> \] <br />​

What can we say about the transformation coordinates for general four-dimensional metric?
Then I think the answer is what I said in #2: there's not much you can do in general.

Keep in mind that you typically can't write down the metric for an entire spacetime in a single coordinate chart, so not only can you not put the metric in a special form, you can't put it in *any* form.

Maybe there is something more that can be said about special forms of the metric on an open neighborhood of any point. Certainly there are special forms in an open neighborhood if you have some kind of symmetry (static, stationary, ...).
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
979
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K