Copenhagen Interpretation of Sleep / Unseen brain?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, particularly in relation to consciousness and the state of the brain during sleep. Participants explore concepts such as wave function collapse, decoherence, and the measurement problem, questioning how these ideas apply to the brain's activity when asleep and the implications of not having direct observation of one's brain.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the brain and body revert to an un-collapsed wave state during sleep and if the wave functions of atoms and cells collapse without observation.
  • Others assert that collapse is not caused by consciousness and that decoherence accounts for apparent collapse, independent of observation.
  • There is a discussion about whether the Copenhagen interpretation is an "objective collapse theory," with some arguing it is not, as decoherence is about interactions with the environment rather than the size of the object.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the role of direct observation in determining particle positions and whether decoherence resolves the measurement problem.
  • Some suggest that while there are many interpretations of quantum mechanics, there is an accepted view among physicists that apparent collapse suffices for practical purposes.
  • Questions arise about the nature of superposition states in the brain during sleep and whether measurements occur while sleeping.
  • There is a reference to the phrase "shut up and calculate," indicating a pragmatic approach among physicists regarding the measurement problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the implications of the Copenhagen interpretation regarding consciousness and measurement. Multiple competing views are presented, particularly concerning the nature of wave function collapse and the role of decoherence.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of clarity on definitions of measurement and observation, as well as the unresolved status of the measurement problem in quantum mechanics. The discussion reflects a variety of interpretations without a definitive resolution.

  • #121
Or maybe a better way of asking... Are you saying that the "measurement problem", as still viewed by Copenhagen, ultimately suggests a fundamental role of the observer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #122
Feeble Wonk said:
Or maybe a better way of asking... Are you saying that the "measurement problem", as still viewed by Copenhagen, ultimately suggests a fundamental role of the observer?

You have to understand observer in QM is not necessarily an organic conscious observer. In modern times its anything that causes decoherence ie is an interaction. With that in mind in Copenhagen observer is absolutely fundamental.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • #123
Thanks. That had been my understanding. I just wasn't certain that's what Atyy had actually meant.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 109 ·
4
Replies
109
Views
11K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K