Core Duo vs Core 2 Duo: Is the 1.66 GHz Faster?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Quadruple Bypass
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Core
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the performance comparison between the Core Duo T2250 1.73 GHz processor and the Core 2 Duo 1.66 GHz processor. Participants explore the implications of processor architecture, core count, and specific use cases, including general computing and gaming.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the Core 2 Duo, being dual-core, generally performs better than the Core Duo in multitasking scenarios.
  • Others note that the Core Duo processors are also dual-core but emphasize that the Core 2 Duo features an upgraded architecture, leading to better performance in many applications.
  • One participant mentions that unless running CPU-intensive programs, the difference in performance may not be significant.
  • There is a discussion about the importance of considering other factors such as L2 cache size, graphics capabilities, and overall laptop specifications when choosing between the two processors.
  • Some participants express confusion over Intel's naming conventions and marketing strategies, indicating that it complicates understanding the differences between processor models.
  • Participants highlight that gaming performance may require different considerations compared to general computing tasks.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the Core 2 Duo is likely to be faster in many scenarios due to its architecture and dual-core design, but there is no consensus on the extent of the performance difference or the impact of specific use cases.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various factors that could influence performance, such as L2 cache size and the specific computational tasks intended for the laptop, but these factors remain unresolved in the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals considering a laptop upgrade, particularly those weighing the performance differences between Core Duo and Core 2 Duo processors for multitasking, gaming, or specific computational needs.

Quadruple Bypass
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
ok here's the deal. i had a computer with a Core Duo T2250 1.73 GHz processor. a replacement computer that a company is sending me is a core 2 duo rated at 1.66 ghz. i told them to find another one because the processor is slower than my old one. but they called me back saying that the 1.66 core 2 duo is faster than the 1.73 core duo. is this true?
 
Last edited:
Computer science news on Phys.org
Yes - (generally) the core 2 duo is dual core, it acts (mostly) like having 2 CPUs.

For general windows/linux stuff using multiple programs it will be faster.
For certain unusual cases it isn't.
 
Thank you kind sir. Now i can relax.
 
mgb_phys said:
Yes - (generally) the core 2 duo is dual core, it acts (mostly) like having 2 CPUs.

For general windows/linux stuff using multiple programs it will be faster.
For certain unusual cases it isn't.

X2. The Core Duo processors are also dual core though. The main difference is the upgraded design architecture... where the Core Duos were based off the P4's and the Core 2 Duos are a completely new architecture. That's when Intel started offering chips with higher FSB speeds and greater L2 cache sizes. Unless your running programs that are CPU intensive, you won't notice much of a difference.
 
Sorry - I got the Core solo/Core duo/Core 2 duo mixed up.
It was easier before Intel had a marketing dept and they just used numbers!
 
mgb_phys said:
Sorry - I got the Core solo/Core duo/Core 2 duo mixed up.
It was easier before Intel had a marketing dept and they just used numbers!

no apology needed... without thinking it's almost a definite that i'll get them mixed up.:biggrin: I know exactly what you mean about the marketing. You know it's bad when you have to learn the names of a new line of products, just because the company doesn't like the sound of the old name.

I'm pretty sure Intels marketing department at least has a good sense of humor!
 
B. Elliott said:
I'm pretty sure Intels marketing department at least has a good sense of humor!
After the multi-coloured cleanroom suit ads - it's obvious they have either a sense of humour or brain damage,.

It used to be said that the architecture of the 8086 proved that Intel didn't do drug testing.
 
possibly useful:
http://www.breakitdownblog.com/choosing-a-core-duo-or-core-2-duo-laptop/

I would include a comparison of L2-cache [and video card option], in addition to processor-speed comparisons between core duo and core 2 duo [both dual-core cpus].
(If you need the 64-bit features, choose the core 2 duo.)

As usual... look at the whole laptop... because the best choice depends on what you need it to do [computational task, portability, battery-life, reliability, etc...]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
quoth robphy
portability, battery-life, reliability, etc...]

or gaming -- which is another beast unto itself. Good gaming boxes are almost always overkill for anything else. You really did not mention your intentions re: said box with new chipset.

Consider: Some high end graphics cards have almost as much memory and cpu oomph as most base systems... and the base usually needs to outclass the graphics card.

Your intentions?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
jim mcnamara said:
quoth robphy
Consider: Some high end graphics cards have almost as much memory and cpu oomph as most base systems... and the base usually needs to outclass the graphics card.

They gotten even further along than then just being compared to base systems... closer to scalable high-end server boards!:eek:

Revolutionary NVIDIA® Tesla™ high performance computing (HPC) solutions arm scientists, engineers and other technical professionals with the power to solve previously unsolvable problems. A dedicated, high performance GPU computing solution, Tesla brings supercomputing power to any workstation or server and to standard, CPU-based server clusters.

http://www.nvidia.com/object/tesla_computing_solutions.html
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
12K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
7K
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K