Coriolis force, real or just an illusion?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
91 replies · 10K views
Change in pressure said:
hause high 50km at equator

C(equator)=2r x 3.14 = 2 x 6371km x 3.14 =40 009km / 24h = 1667km/h

C(ball)= 2r x 3.14 = 2 x (6371km+50km) x3.14 =40323km /24h = 1680km/h
1680-1667=13km/h

top of hause travel 13km/h faster then bottom...

so this 13km/h is additional velocity which ball have in east direction


with this information we can calculate how far east will ball hit the ground....
Given the time of fall, yes. Note that the proposed calculation does not depend at all on the radius of the earth. The 6371 cancels out.

But that's the inertial frame calculation. In the rotating frame there is no difference in velocity. The explanation for the deviation in the landing point derives from Coriolis instead.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Change in pressure said:
so this 13km/h is additional velocity which ball have in east direction

with this information we can calculate how far east will ball hit the ground....
Approximately. For a more precise calculation in the inertial frame you would find the intersection of the elliptical orbit with the curved surface.