Correct Angle for FSW in Fabry-Perot Interferometer

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on determining the correct angle, θ1, for the Fabry-Perot Interferometer when light is incident on the boundary of the plate. It is established that for normal incidence, θ1 is zero degrees, which aligns with the textbook example. The confusion arises from the assumption that θ1 could be 45 degrees, but it is clarified that at normal incidence, the transmission angle is indeed zero. A side view sketch is recommended for better understanding of the angle's implications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fabry-Perot Interferometer principles
  • Knowledge of light transmission angles
  • Familiarity with normal incidence concepts in optics
  • Ability to interpret diagrams and sketches in optical contexts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of light behavior at normal incidence in optical systems
  • Research the mathematical derivation of transmission angles in Fabry-Perot Interferometers
  • Examine side view sketches of optical setups to visualize angle relationships
  • Explore advanced topics in interferometry and its applications in precision measurement
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in optics, physicists working with interferometry, and anyone involved in the design or analysis of optical systems.

Blanchdog
Messages
56
Reaction score
22
Homework Statement
What are the free spectral range and fringe width in a Fabry-Perot Interferometer made up of two silver coated plates each with reflectance R = 0.9, transmittance T = 0.05, and Absorbance A = 0.05? The plate separation is d = 0.5cm with interior index n1 = 1. Suppose the wavelength being observed near normal incidence is 587nm.
Relevant Equations
FSR = wavelength^2/(2 n d cos (theta1))
Sorry for the lack of formatting, I'm in a rush to write this before I go pick someone up from work. My question is what is theta1? Is it 45 degrees because that's the angle the light hits the boundary of the plate to the n1 medium? Or is it 0? It seems like it should be 45 but there's an example in the textbook that uses 0. Or is cos(theta1) imaginary? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
near normal incidence
For normal incidence this ##\theta## is zero. The central black spot in the first picture here . Make a side view sketch (or look further down :smile:) to see where ##\ \theta\ne 0\ ## comes in.

##\ ##
 
BvU said:
For normal incidence this ##\theta## is zero. The central black spot in the first picture here . Make a side view sketch (or look further down :smile:) to see where ##\ \theta\ne 0\ ## comes in.

##\ ##
Ah thank you, I was getting tripped up because I knew ##\theta_1## was the transmission angle but couldn't figure out what it was, but if the light is at normal incidence then the transmission angle will be zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K