Correct Angle for FSW in Fabry-Perot Interferometer

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on determining the correct angle, theta1, for light incidence in a Fabry-Perot interferometer. It clarifies that for normal incidence, theta1 is zero degrees, which aligns with the textbook example. The confusion arises from the assumption that theta1 might be 45 degrees when light hits the boundary of the plate. A side view sketch is suggested to visualize the angles involved. Ultimately, the consensus is that for normal incidence, the transmission angle is indeed zero.
Blanchdog
Messages
56
Reaction score
22
Homework Statement
What are the free spectral range and fringe width in a Fabry-Perot Interferometer made up of two silver coated plates each with reflectance R = 0.9, transmittance T = 0.05, and Absorbance A = 0.05? The plate separation is d = 0.5cm with interior index n1 = 1. Suppose the wavelength being observed near normal incidence is 587nm.
Relevant Equations
FSR = wavelength^2/(2 n d cos (theta1))
Sorry for the lack of formatting, I'm in a rush to write this before I go pick someone up from work. My question is what is theta1? Is it 45 degrees because that's the angle the light hits the boundary of the plate to the n1 medium? Or is it 0? It seems like it should be 45 but there's an example in the textbook that uses 0. Or is cos(theta1) imaginary? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
near normal incidence
For normal incidence this ##\theta## is zero. The central black spot in the first picture here . Make a side view sketch (or look further down :smile:) to see where ##\ \theta\ne 0\ ## comes in.

##\ ##
 
BvU said:
For normal incidence this ##\theta## is zero. The central black spot in the first picture here . Make a side view sketch (or look further down :smile:) to see where ##\ \theta\ne 0\ ## comes in.

##\ ##
Ah thank you, I was getting tripped up because I knew ##\theta_1## was the transmission angle but couldn't figure out what it was, but if the light is at normal incidence then the transmission angle will be zero.
 
Thread 'Chain falling out of a horizontal tube onto a table'
My attempt: Initial total M.E = PE of hanging part + PE of part of chain in the tube. I've considered the table as to be at zero of PE. PE of hanging part = ##\frac{1}{2} \frac{m}{l}gh^{2}##. PE of part in the tube = ##\frac{m}{l}(l - h)gh##. Final ME = ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}gh^{2}## + ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}##. Since Initial ME = Final ME. Therefore, ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}## = ##\frac{m}{l}(l-h)gh##. Solving this gives: ## v = \sqrt{2g(l-h)}##. But the answer in the book...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K