Correct Angle for FSW in Fabry-Perot Interferometer

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the correct angle, theta1, for light incidence in a Fabry-Perot interferometer. It clarifies that for normal incidence, theta1 is zero degrees, which aligns with the textbook example. The confusion arises from the assumption that theta1 might be 45 degrees when light hits the boundary of the plate. A side view sketch is suggested to visualize the angles involved. Ultimately, the consensus is that for normal incidence, the transmission angle is indeed zero.
Blanchdog
Messages
56
Reaction score
22
Homework Statement
What are the free spectral range and fringe width in a Fabry-Perot Interferometer made up of two silver coated plates each with reflectance R = 0.9, transmittance T = 0.05, and Absorbance A = 0.05? The plate separation is d = 0.5cm with interior index n1 = 1. Suppose the wavelength being observed near normal incidence is 587nm.
Relevant Equations
FSR = wavelength^2/(2 n d cos (theta1))
Sorry for the lack of formatting, I'm in a rush to write this before I go pick someone up from work. My question is what is theta1? Is it 45 degrees because that's the angle the light hits the boundary of the plate to the n1 medium? Or is it 0? It seems like it should be 45 but there's an example in the textbook that uses 0. Or is cos(theta1) imaginary? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
near normal incidence
For normal incidence this ##\theta## is zero. The central black spot in the first picture here . Make a side view sketch (or look further down :smile:) to see where ##\ \theta\ne 0\ ## comes in.

##\ ##
 
BvU said:
For normal incidence this ##\theta## is zero. The central black spot in the first picture here . Make a side view sketch (or look further down :smile:) to see where ##\ \theta\ne 0\ ## comes in.

##\ ##
Ah thank you, I was getting tripped up because I knew ##\theta_1## was the transmission angle but couldn't figure out what it was, but if the light is at normal incidence then the transmission angle will be zero.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
52
Views
9K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Back
Top