Correct terminology for taking differentials?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the terminology used to describe two mathematical operations: (1) taking the differential of a function, represented as d(xcos x)=(cos x-xsin x)dx, and (2) differentiating a function, expressed as \frac{d}{dx}(xcos x)=(cos x-xsin x). Participants agree that while both can be classified under differentiation, the first operation is best described as "taking a differential," whereas the second is simply "differentiation" or "finding the derivative." The conversation highlights the ambiguity in terminology and the differing interpretations based on mathematical context, particularly between standard calculus and nonstandard calculus perspectives.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus concepts, specifically differentiation and differentials.
  • Familiarity with Leibniz notation in calculus.
  • Basic knowledge of differential geometry and its applications.
  • Awareness of the differences between standard and nonstandard calculus interpretations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the definitions and applications of differentials in calculus.
  • Study the principles of differential geometry and its relevance to differentials.
  • Explore the differences between standard calculus and nonstandard calculus interpretations.
  • Learn about the historical context of Leibniz notation and its various interpretations over time.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, calculus students, educators, and anyone interested in the precise terminology and conceptual distinctions in differentiation and differentials.

bcrowell
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
6,723
Reaction score
431
Consider the following two calculations:

(1) d(x\cos x)=(\cos x-x\sin x)dx

(2) \frac{d}{dx}(x\cos x)=(\cos x-x\sin x)

I would describe these both as differentiation. Is there a standard terminology that allows one to make the distinction between the two, if desired? The best I could come up with was "taking a differential" for 1, as distinguished from "differentiating a function" for 2. But these are both awkward, and I don't know if they're standard or would be widely understood.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(2) is the <differentiation of a 1-var function> which basically is a mapping from a set of functions to a set of functions, that is an operator (linear mapping) which takes a function and 'spits' a function. To the 1st formula, I see a nice interpretation in terms of differential geometry: applying the exterior differential on a scalar (0-form field) gives a 1-form field.
 
Last edited:
dextercioby said:
(2) is the <differentiation of a 1-var function> which basically is a mapping from a set of functions to a set of functions, that is an operator (linear mapping) which takes a function and 'spits' a function. To the 1st formula, I see an interpretation in terms of differential geometry only: applying the exterior differential on a scalar (0-form) gives a 1-form.

Thanks for your reply, but I wasn't asking for an interpretation. I was asking about terminology. (There are many different interpretations of the Leibniz notation, going back over 300 years. All of these interpretations are equally valid.)
 
dextercioby said:
(1) is the differential of a function http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differential_of_a_function, (2) is the derivative of the same function (written using Leibniz notation).

OK. I was asking for terminology for the operation or process. So would you say that the terms I suggested originally are the best available, and/or are widely understood?
 
By "differentiating f(x)" everyone understands "calculating the 1st derivative of f(x) (provided it exists) at a generic point x of the function's domain". That's your (2). "taking/computing/considering the 1st differential of f(x)" would naturally depict your 1st option. There's not too much room for terminology variation here, really.

If (indefinite) integration (of a function) is an operation, then "taking a differential (of a function)" is the reverse operation (up to a so-called 'integration constant') . ## \int d f = f +C##

Perhaps someone else can better address your question. I only wrote what I knew. :)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bcrowell
OK, thanks for your help -- much appreciated!
 
If someone asked me to differentiate x^2cos(x) (with respect to x implied because it's the only variable in the expression), I would do what you did in (2).

So, differentiation = the act or process of taking a derivative.

Now, whether "finding the differential" can be referred to as differentiation or not depends on what school of thought you are following.

Following the modern/"standard" interpretation, the act of finding a differential isn't really differentiation, although differentiation is a step you need to perform. This is because a differential is defined in terms of the derivative. (More specifically, it is defined as a change in the linear approximation of a function, which automatically brings in the derivative.)

In contrast, a proponent of Nonstandard Calculus may argue that finding the differential IS differentiating followed by a minor rearrangement. In other words, he would be interpreting the differential as an infinitesimal change in the function rather than as a change in the linear approximation. In that sense, all you are doing in (1) is differentiating.

To be safe, I would only refer to (2) as differentiating and refer to (1) as either "finding the differential" or "calculating the differential." I don't see anything wrong with "taking the differential" either, although, as you said, it does sound a bit awkward.
 
The second method is finding the derivative of a function, i.e. it's rate of change at a point, the first method is finding the exterior derivative of a function (i.e. a 0-form) which is a method of finding the field of sheets (i.e. density) generated by this form
http://math.stackexchange.com/quest...on-zero-closed-loop-line-integrals-via-sheets

In other words, the second method takes the perspective of functions as curves, surfaces etc... the other views functions as densities, and we geometrically represent these densities by sheets, how many sheets (intersecting sheets, e.g. 2 forms etc...) do you mass through as you go along a curve/surface etc...

Thus the terminology for the first is 'taking an exterior derivative' and for the second your 'taking a derivative'.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
bcrowell said:
Consider the following two calculations:

(1) d(x\cos x)=(\cos x-x\sin x)dx

(2) \frac{d}{dx}(x\cos x)=(\cos x-x\sin x)

I would describe these both as differentiation. Is there a standard terminology that allows one to make the distinction between the two, if desired? The best I could come up with was "taking a differential" for 1, as distinguished from "differentiating a function" for 2. But these are both awkward, and I don't know if they're standard or would be widely understood.

I'd say the first is "differentials" and the second is "differentiation" or the "derivative". Usually, one would define the derivative first:

##\frac{dy}{dx} = \lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{y(x+h)-y(h)}{h}##

Then, define the differential as:

##dy = \frac{dy}{dx} dx##

This would be standard if developing calculus rigorously (in my experience, anyway).
 
  • #11
It doesn't seem to me that anyone with any reasonable experience could possibly misinterpret the terminology you used in your original post.

Chet
 
  • #12
(1) exterior differentiation
(2) differentiation
 
  • #13
bcrowell said:
Consider the following two calculations:

(1) d(x\cos x)=(\cos x-x\sin x)dx

(2) \frac{d}{dx}(x\cos x)=(\cos x-x\sin x)

I would describe these both as differentiation..

Discussions of differentials on the forum usually don't have a clear resolution! There are various opinions.

My opinion:

If you are talking about differential geometry then differentials like dx have a well defined interpretation (which I'd have to look up). However, on the forum, most posts using differentials aren't talking about differential geometry.

You number 2. is differentiation.

Your number 1. is differentiation. It's differentiation using abiguity. People applying calculus tend to use symbols like x ambiguously. They use them to stand for both variables and functions. If x is a function of some other variable t then you can treat dx as a reminder to include the factor x&#039;(t) = \frac{dx}{dt} in the derivative.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K