Correcting a Common Typo in PR Book | Explaining the Concept of Work

  • Thread starter Thread starter AznBoi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a potential typo in a physics textbook regarding the concept of work done by an expanding gas against its surroundings. Participants are examining the definitions and conventions related to work, internal energy, and heat in thermodynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the accuracy of a statement in the textbook about work done by an expanding gas. They discuss whether the work should be considered positive or negative based on different conventions. Additionally, there are inquiries about the relationship between heat and internal energy, particularly in the context of different specific heat capacities.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the conventions used in thermodynamics, with some participants suggesting that the textbook may be inconsistent with modern conventions. Others are clarifying the distinctions between heat and internal energy and how they relate to work done by the gas. Guidance has been offered regarding the first law of thermodynamics and the conditions under which certain equations apply.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that different textbooks may use varying conventions, leading to confusion. There is also mention of historical conventions that may influence current interpretations.

AznBoi
Messages
470
Reaction score
0
Typo in PR book??

Personally I think PR has tons of mistakes. I think I've found one in the book and it confuses me. Can someone see if it is a mistake? Thanks

PR says: "The expanding gas did negative work against its surroundings, pushing the piston upward."

--I think it should be: The expanding gas did positive work against its surroundings, pushing the piston upward. I think the book meant that the surroundings did negative work on the system.

This is a typo right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Also, can [tex]Q=nC_{p}\Delta T[/tex] be written as [tex]\Delta U=nC_{p}\Delta T[/tex]?? Why or why not?

Likewise, can [tex]\Delta U=nC_{v}\Delta T[/tex] be written as [tex]Q=nC_{v}\Delta T[/tex]?? Please explain. I thought that Internal energy and heat are different things but they can be used interchangably??

I have two books and they use them interchangably so I don't know which I need to use since they all equal the same amount of joules but they have different variables which are suppoes to be different right?

HyperPhysics also says that [tex]\Delta U= Q=nC_{v}\Delta T[/tex]. I'm not sure about C_p though. Thanks for your help!
 
AznBoi said:
Personally I think PR has tons of mistakes. I think I've found one in the book and it confuses me. Can someone see if it is a mistake? Thanks

PR says: "The expanding gas did negative work against its surroundings, pushing the piston upward."

--I think it should be: The expanding gas did positive work against its surroundings, pushing the piston upward. I think the book meant that the surroundings did negative work on the system.

This is a typo right?
The gas performs positive work on the surroundings. Or you could say that the work done by the surroundings on the gas is negative.

But this is just a convention. 20-30 years ago the convention was that work done on the gas was positive and work done by the gas was negative. So if you have an old book that may be the problem.

AM
 
Last edited:
Andrew Mason said:
The gas performs positive work on the surroundings. Or you could say that the work done by the surroundings on the gas is negative.

But this is just a convention. 20-30 years ago the convention was that work done on the gas was positive and work done by the gas was negative. So if you have an old book that may be the problem.

AM

Yeah, but the book was using the newer convention earlier. lol, I think the author is getting mixed up. -_- Mabye he was too used to the older convention haha
 
AznBoi said:
Also, can [tex]Q=nC_{p}\Delta T[/tex] be written as [tex]\Delta U=nC_{p}\Delta T[/tex]?? Why or why not?
No. dQ and dU are the same only if W = 0 (no change in volume).

Likewise, can [tex]\Delta U=nC_{v}\Delta T[/tex] be written as [tex]Q=nC_{v}\Delta T[/tex]?? Please explain. I thought that Internal energy and heat are different things but they can be used interchangably??
No. Heat flow is equal to change in internal energy + work done by the gas (first law).

I have two books and they use them interchangably so I don't know which I need to use since they all equal the same amount of joules but they have different variables which are suppoes to be different right?

HyperPhysics also says that [tex]\Delta U= Q=nC_{v}\Delta T[/tex]. I'm not sure about C_p though. Thanks for your help!
The first law of thermodynamics always applies:

[tex]\Delta Q = \Delta U + W[/tex]

where W is the work done by the system

If volume is constant, no work is done (PdV = 0). So, for constant volume
process:
[tex]\Delta U = Q = nC_{V}\Delta T[/tex]

If pressure is constant (volume is not), [itex]d(PV) = PdV + VdP = PdV = d(nRT) = nR\Delta T[/itex]

[tex]\Delta Q = nC_{P}\Delta T = nC_{V}\Delta T + W = nC_{V}\Delta T + P\Delta V = nC_{V}\Delta T + nR\Delta T = n(C_{V} + R)\Delta T[/tex]

So Cp and Cv are always related this way: [itex]C_p - C_v = R[/itex]

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
No. dQ and dU are the same only if W = 0 (no change in volume).

No. Heat flow is equal to change in internal energy + work done by the gas (first law).

The first law of thermodynamics always applies:

[tex]\Delta Q = \Delta U + W[/tex]

where W is the work done by the system

If volume is constant, no work is done (PdV = 0). So, for constant volume
process:
[tex]\Delta U = Q = nC_{V}\Delta T[/tex]

If pressure is constant (volume is not), [itex]d(PV) = PdV + VdP = PdV = d(nRT) = nR\Delta T[/itex]

[tex]\Delta Q = nC_{P}\Delta T = nC_{V}\Delta T + W = nC_{V}\Delta T + P\Delta V = nC_{V}\Delta T + nR\Delta T = n(C_{V} + R)\Delta T[/tex]

So Cp and Cv are always related this way: [itex]C_p - C_v = R[/itex]

AM


So basically, stating what you've said: [tex]\Delta U=nC_{v}\Delta T[/tex]
is equal to [tex]Q=nC_{v}\Delta T[/tex] when there's no work done on or by the gas. (when the graph is a vertical line)

However, [tex]Q=nC_{p}\Delta T[/tex] can never be equal to [tex]\Delta U=nC_{p}\Delta T[/tex] because work is always done on the system when the pressure remains constant. (horizontal line)

Are these assumptions correctly stated? Thanks for the help! :smile:
 
Last edited:
AznBoi said:
So basically, stating what you've said: [tex]\Delta U=nC_{v}\Delta T[/tex]
is equal to [tex]Q=nC_{v}\Delta T[/tex] when there's no work done on or by the gas. (when the graph is a vertical line)

However, [tex]Q=nC_{p}\Delta T[/tex] can never be equal to [tex]\Delta U=nC_{p}\Delta T[/tex] because work is always done on the system when the pressure remains constant. (horizontal line)

Are these assumptions correctly stated? Thanks for the help! :smile:
Correct. Except when dT = 0, of course.

AM
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
12K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
3K