Correlation between a car's horsepower and maximum strength of Cable

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the correlation between a car's horsepower or torque and the maximum break strength of a cable needed to hold the car stationary. The scope includes theoretical considerations, assumptions about tire behavior, and safety factors in engineering applications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks to find a correlation between a car's horsepower or torque and the required cable break strength, assuming the wheels do not spin.
  • Another participant argues that the engine's power is irrelevant if the tires can spin, emphasizing that the static friction force is the determining factor.
  • A participant suggests using a safety factor of four times the vehicle's weight for cable strength, noting that static friction depends on the normal force.
  • One contribution discusses the theoretical implications of power, work, and force, suggesting that with specific conditions, the force required could be extremely high.
  • Another participant posits that even a human on a bicycle could exert enough force to break any cable with the right transmission setup.
  • There are multiple suggestions regarding safety factors, with some advocating for four times the vehicle's weight while others propose two times as sufficient.
  • A participant references a practical example from a television show where a team was able to pull a car, implying real-world applications of the discussed concepts.
  • One participant emphasizes that the engine's torque is affected by the gearbox, which complicates the relationship between engine power and cable strength.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relevance of engine power versus static friction in determining cable strength. There is no consensus on the exact safety factor to use, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to calculate the required cable strength.

Contextual Notes

Assumptions about tire behavior and the influence of gearing on torque are central to the discussion. Participants highlight the complexity of the relationship between horsepower, torque, and cable strength, indicating that various factors must be considered in calculations.

primesource20
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Science quiz question:

How to determine the correlation between a car’s horsepower / torque and the maximum break strength of a cable that will hold the motor stationery.

Assuming that the wheels of a car do not spin, how can I determine what the required cable’s break strength needs to be to ensure that a car can be held stationery . My objective is to find the correlation between the torque or horsepower of any vehicle and the corresponding break strength of cable that will hold the car in check.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any manual transmission car can spin its wheels so this is a function of tire static friction force only. Engine has nothing to do with it.
 
This is a theoretical question therefore I need to assume that the tires do not spin. I want to determine the strength of cable required to restrain the power of the motor.
 
Assuming safety is a factor, I would use 4 times the vehicle's weight. Static friction is a function of the normal force, and unless there is some reason to assume a very high Us (>1), using 4x vehicle weight should give you a good safety margin. If safety is not a concern, and you really want to watch a car break free, try using a cable equal to the vehicle's weight.

Fish
 
primesource20 said:
This is a theoretical question therefore I need to assume that the tires do not spin. I want to determine the strength of cable required to restrain the power of the motor.

The answer is really almost infinite.

Power = Work/Time = (Force * Distance)/Time

If you decrease the distance and increase the time then Force goes through the roof! That is, if you move the cable 1 foot per hour @ 100HP the force is:

100HP * 33,000ftlbf/min * 60min/hour * 1/ft => 198,000,000lbsf

You might achieve this through gearing or anyone of a number of schemes.

Fish
 
In fact you don't need a car. Even a human on a bicycle could break any thickness of cable given a suitable transmission.
 
Fish4Fun said:
Assuming safety is a factor, I would use 4 times the vehicle's weight. Static friction is a function of the normal force, and unless there is some reason to assume a very high Us (>1), using 4x vehicle weight should give you a good safety margin. If safety is not a concern, and you really want to watch a car break free, try using a cable equal to the vehicle's weight.

Fish
Just for clarity, 4x the weight makes for a 400% safety factor.
 
I don't know how strong the cable needs to be but a few years ago on Top Gear a tug-of-war team held and then pulled backwards a top of the range Mercedes with Jeremy Clarkson trying to pull the team.
 
As said earlier, it has nothing to do with engine power. It depends on http://hpwizard.com/tire-friction-coefficient.html" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Fish4Fun said:
Assuming safety is a factor, I would use 4 times the vehicle's weight. Static friction is a function of the normal force, and unless there is some reason to assume a very high Us (>1), using 4x vehicle weight should give you a good safety margin.
That's a good starting point. I'd go with 2x weight, honestly, but if you feel like giving yourself extra room. Anyways, you still need to do some math.

The value above gives you maximum force on the wheel, which you can convert to maximum possible torque on wheels. Engine doesn't spin wheels directly, though. There is a gear box in between, which can significantly alter the torque. In high gear, torque on engine is significantly higher than on wheels. So you have to multiply by gearing ratio of highest gear to get torque on engine.

Now, you compare this value to the peak torque of the engine. Odds are, the torque of the engine is going to be lower. In either case, take the lower of two values, add a bit of safety margin, and that's the torque you have to deal with.

Finally, the torque needs to be converted back into tension. Find the greatest arm length between the engine's shaft and attachment points, multiply that by torque, and that should give you the minimum breaking strength you should be shooting for.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
20K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
30K