B Cosmic expansion and shock waves

  • Thread starter Thread starter Adel Makram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosmic expansion
Click For Summary
Galaxies that surpass the speed of light during cosmic expansion do not emit radiation waves akin to a sonic boom. The concept of absolute motion does not apply as space expands, meaning local light emission remains unaffected. Cosmic inflation occurred before the formation of stars and galaxies, complicating the notion of "speed" in curved spacetime. While particles exceeding light speed in a medium produce Cerenkov radiation, this phenomenon does not relate to galaxies in the context of cosmic expansion. Therefore, the analogy to sonic booms is not applicable in this scenario.
Adel Makram
Messages
632
Reaction score
15
TL;DR
Do galaxies that have surpassed the speed of light during the cosmic inflation process emit radiation waves comparable to the sonic boom when an aeroplane breaches the sound barrier?
Do galaxies that have surpassed the speed of light during the cosmic expansion emit radiation waves comparable to the sonic boom when an aeroplane breaches the sound barrier?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Adel Makram said:
TL;DR Summary: Do galaxies that have surpassed the speed of light during the cosmic inflation process emit radiation waves comparable to the sonic boom when an aeroplane breaches the sound barrier?
No. When space expands, there is no sense in which a galaxy has absolute motion. Locally, stars will emit light independent of the expansion of space. There's nothing happening locally to affect the emission of light.

Note that cosmic inflation took place in the very early universe when there were no stars of galaxies.
 
"Speed" is a slightly more slippery concept in curved spacetime than flat spacetime, and those galaxies aren't moving faster than light in the relevant sense.

Particles that exceed the speed of light in a medium emit Cerenkov radiation as they slow down.
 
Moderator's note: Spin-off from another thread due to topic change. In the second link referenced, there is a claim about a physical interpretation of frame field. Consider a family of observers whose worldlines fill a region of spacetime. Each of them carries a clock and a set of mutually orthogonal rulers. Each observer points in the (timelike) direction defined by its worldline's tangent at any given event along it. What about the rulers each of them carries ? My interpretation: each...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
722