How Does the Cosmological Constant Change with the Expansion of the Universe?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the ratio of the cosmological constant density to the critical density in a hypothetical radiation-dominated universe. The user understands that the current dark energy density is 0.7 times the critical density but is confused about how to apply this in the context of the universe's expansion. The key point is that the Hubble parameter scales with the scale factor, leading to the relationship H/H0 = a^-2, which is crucial for determining the density ratios. The user is encouraged to multiply the expression by a form of one that incorporates the critical density to clarify the calculations. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the scaling relationships in cosmology to solve the problem effectively.
TRB8985
Messages
74
Reaction score
15

Homework Statement


Suppose (incorrectly) that H scales as temperature squared all the way back until the time when the temperature of the universe was 1019 GeV/kB (i.e., suppose the universe was radiation dominated all the way back to the Planck time).

Also suppose that today the dark energy is in the form of a cosmological constant Λ, such that ρΛ today is equal to 0.7*ρcritical and ρΛ remains constant throughout the history of the universe. What was ρΛ / (3H2/8πG) back then?

(From Modern Cosmology by Dodelson, pg. 25)

Homework Equations


ρ_critical = (3H02/8πG)

T = 1019 GeV/kB = 1.16045* 1032 K

T0 = 2.725 K

For a radiation-dominated universe, a ∝ t1/2.

The Attempt at a Solution



I understand a part of the solution wherein ρΛ / ρcritical = 0.7, but I'm supposed to multiply this value by something.

In the answer key, Dodelson multiplies 0.7 by the ratio of (H0 / H)2. The text states:

"By assumption, the universe is forever radiation dominated (clearly not true today, but a good approximation early on), so H / H0 = a-2."

Given this, the inverse of H / H0 would result in a2, and since H scales as temperature squared, then (a2)2 = a4 which can then be applied to the ratio of the temperature. That latter part makes sense. However, I'm not quite understanding where Dodelson pulled the ratio of H0 / H from to get things started.

Could anyone provide any insight on this? Thank you very much for your help.

(This question is being attempted via an independent study and not a homework question. Additionally, there are no cosmology specialists at my university who could provide any useful feedback on how to attack this situation.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TRB8985 said:

Homework Statement


Suppose (incorrectly) that H scales as temperature squared ...

Multiply the expression in the exercise by one in the form ##1 = \rho_{cr} / \rho_{cr}##, then use equation (1.3) to substitute for ##\rho_{cr}## in the numerator (but not in the denominator).
 
  • Like
Likes TRB8985
George, your input was incredibly helpful and brought the entire picture together. Thank you so much for your help! I appreciate that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
833
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
4K