Could a fish swim faster than sound?

  • Thread starter Thread starter haael
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sound
AI Thread Summary
Fish and birds cannot swim or fly faster than the speed of sound using only their natural propulsion methods, such as fins or wings. The speed of sound is significantly faster in water, approximately 4.5 times that in air, making it even more challenging for aquatic animals to reach that speed. While dolphins can achieve high speeds by riding the wake of boats, they cannot independently break the sound barrier. The Pistol Shrimp can create a cavitation bubble with its claw movement that travels faster than sound, but this does not equate to the animal itself moving at that speed. Theoretical discussions suggest that while it may be possible to exceed the speed of sound in water, no known animal can do so without mechanical assistance.
haael
Messages
537
Reaction score
35
Is it possible for a fish or a bird to swim/fly faster than sound? I mean: no rockets, no free fall, no cheating by tying a string to the ground and using it to violate the conservation of momentum.

Is it possible to accelerate over the speed of sound using only fins, wings or screws?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
haael said:
Is it possible for a fish or a bird to swim/fly faster than sound? I mean: no rockets, no free fall, no cheating by tying a string to the ground and using it to violate the conservation of momentum.

Is it possible to accelerate over the speed of sound using only fins, wings or screws?

Not possible, the speed of sound is around the speed a bullet is ejected from a gun.
 
Another thing to consider...the speed of sound is much much faster in water, isn't it?

Edit: looked it up. Approximately 4.5x faster in water.
 
Last edited:
well actually a dolphin can't swim that fast, but put it behind a cruise liner or another ship and they can go pretty darn fast. Faster then they're supposed to, by riding on the wake, as there is less drag due to the ship doing the work for the dolphin. So i wouldn't be surprised if they could do it if they were behind a ship that traveled sufficiently faster than the speed of sound. Assuming, that the terminal velocity of water, like that of air, isn't lower than the speed of sound itself.
 
no there's no animal that can break the sound barrier without attaching rockets to it and that would be pretty cool/cruel. I wonder if we could genetically engineer one some day to do that though, maybe convert food into rocket fuel or instead of flapping wings eject streams of air out the back. I was watching a documentary based on possible animals that could exist on alien planets, they had an animation of a bird firing streams of air behind it to propel itself but I don't think they said it was possible for it to break the sound barrier.
 
Of course it's possible in theory to go faster than the speed of sound under water, but in practice its nowhere near possible for an animal to get going that fast.

Simon Malzard, but then the water would be traveling, so the dolphin would just be inside water which is traveling faster than the speed of sound.
 
Well, this guy wants to break the sound barrier with no motors...

http://dnainfo.com/20100122/manhattan/skydiver-will-attempt-break-speed-of-sound-with-freefall-from-space
 
I think the point of the question is can you theoretically swim faster than the speed of sound in the medium.
If swimming involves pushing against a fluid can you do this faster than a 'push' can travel through the fluid?
 
cstoos said:
Another thing to consider...the speed of sound is much much faster in water, isn't it?

Edit: looked it up. Approximately 4.5x faster in water.

Yes, the molecules are closer together in water, so disturbance travels faster.

Simon Malzard said:
well actually a dolphin can't swim that fast, but put it behind a cruise liner or another ship and they can go pretty darn fast. Faster then they're supposed to, by riding on the wake, as there is less drag due to the ship doing the work for the dolphin. So i wouldn't be surprised if they could do it if they were behind a ship that traveled sufficiently faster than the speed of sound. Assuming, that the terminal velocity of water, like that of air, isn't lower than the speed of sound itself.

The ship would have to be traveling at 720 Knots to surpass the speed of sound.
 
  • #10
Maybe not swim faster than sound, but the 'Pistol Shrimp' can move faster than the speed of sound. Its claw closing travels faster than the speed of sound, taking the local pressure to below the vapour pressure of water, causing a cavitation bubble, which it uses to hunt prey.

Actually, people think this kind of thing could have applications in future fusion technology, the temperatures created as the cavitation bubble collapses are pretty impressive.

Perhaps not what you were looking for, but quite interesting I think.

,Simon
 
  • #11
SimonRoberts said:
Maybe not swim faster than sound, but the 'Pistol Shrimp' can move faster than the speed of sound. Its claw closing travels faster than the speed of sound, taking the local pressure to below the vapour pressure of water, causing a cavitation bubble, which it uses to hunt prey.

Actually, people think this kind of thing could have applications in future fusion technology, the temperatures created as the cavitation bubble collapses are pretty impressive.

Perhaps not what you were looking for, but quite interesting I think.

,Simon

I don't think it moves faster than sound because of this action. The entire mass of the shrimp would need to be accelerated to this velocity and the force of the action is not enough to do this.
 
  • #12
I meant that its claw travels faster than the speed of sound. The cavitation bubble is somewhat similar to a sonic boom in air. The shrimp remains stationary.
 
  • #13
I think the point of the question is can you theoretically swim faster than the speed of sound in the medium.
If swimming involves pushing against a fluid can you do this faster than a 'push' can travel through the fluid?
Yes, that's exactly my point. Does anyone know the answer?
 
  • #14
cstoos said:
Another thing to consider...the speed of sound is much much faster in water, isn't it?

Edit: looked it up. Approximately 4.5x faster in water.


Which must explain why thinks sound different underwater?

I remember what it sound like but it does sound different.

Or maybe it is because you can't hear the low frequencies because they are reflected away?
 
Back
Top