Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Could domes have had the function of camera obscura but not anymore?

  1. Jan 25, 2013 #1
    http://vimeo.com/11789304#

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    i mean seems evident a dome is intended as a camera obscura even oculus in latin means eye

    but how is it posible that knowledge isnt any more?

    what sense does it make to put a flat lens in the oculus so theres no effect any more? why they dont put the right optics oculus in domes?

    it would appear to people as walking of clouds , quite appropiate for the place:confused:

    well i just found an obscure reference:

    http://books.google.es/books?id=F1T...=onepage&q=dome oculus camera obscura&f=false
     
    Last edited: Jan 25, 2013
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 25, 2013 #2

    Evo

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Please post a specific reference, a link to a book is not satisfactory.
     
  4. Jan 25, 2013 #3
    well this is a personal theory slightly backed up by that book( i cant copy paste)
     
  5. Jan 25, 2013 #4

    OmCheeto

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    hmmm.... My personal theory is that it was the predecessor to the sunroof.

    [​IMG]
     
  6. Jan 25, 2013 #5

    Evo

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    That's what I thought, sorry, we don't allow personal theories.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Could domes have had the function of camera obscura but not anymore?
Loading...