EM and Gravitational binding energy for quarks

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electromagnetic (EM) and gravitational binding energy of a \(\Sigma\) triplet of baryons, assuming a distance of 1 femtometer between quarks. The Rydberg Energy Formula, \(E = \frac{1}{2} {\alpha}^2 (\mu {c}^2)\), is proposed for EM binding energy, but it is clarified that quarks are bound by strong forces, not electromagnetic forces. For gravitational binding energy, the formula \(U = \frac{G m_1 m_2}{r}\) is mentioned, but it is noted that gravitational energy is negligible in this context. The energy differences consist of Coulomb, spin dot spin magnetic, and spin dot spin QCD terms, each approximately 1 MeV.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of baryon structure and quark composition
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic and gravitational potential energy equations
  • Knowledge of strong force interactions in quantum chromodynamics (QCD)
  • Basic grasp of reduced mass calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of quantum chromodynamics (QCD) and its role in particle interactions
  • Study the derivation and applications of the Rydberg Energy Formula in particle physics
  • Explore advanced topics in baryon decay and interactions, focusing on spin dot spin terms
  • Investigate numerical methods for calculating binding energies in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, theoretical physicists, and students studying quantum mechanics and quantum chromodynamics who are interested in baryon interactions and binding energy calculations.

Kenai
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

If I have a \Sigma triplet of baryons, how do I calculate the EM and gravitational binding energy of these baryons? (assuming there is 1fm of distance between quarks and that each quark has 1/3 the mass of the \Sigma),

I guess I have to use the EM and Gravitational Potential Energies for this.

Will be ok using the Rydberg Energy Formula for thr EM binding energie?

E = \frac{1}{2} {\alpha}^2 (\mu {c}^2)

With \mu being the reduced mass.

http://books.google.com.pe/books?id...ge&q="electromagnetic binding energy"&f=false

And what about the Gravitational thing? (just U = G m1m2 /r ?)

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kenai said:
And what about the Gravitational thing? (just U = G m1m2 /r ?)
If you just want an order of magnitude estimate, then this will work, and the directly analogous equation for the electrical force will also work. If you want an accurate number, you'd have to devote the next decade if your life to learning to do numerical QCD calculations. The gravitational energy is of course negligible for any practical purpose.
 
The gravitational energy is negligible, and is never considered.
You can't use the Rydberg formula for the EM energy because the quarks are not held together by EM, but by strong forces.
There are three components to the energy differences:
!. Coulomb ~ qq'/r^2.
2. A spin dot spin magnetic term.
3. A spin dot spin QCD term.

They are all of comparable size ~ 1 MeV.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K