Could Electron Interference Be Explained by Undetectable Waves?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sadie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Waves
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the concept of electron behavior in relation to undetectable waves, particularly in the context of the double-slit experiment. The original poster suggests that electrons may ride on waves that are undetectable, leading to interference patterns. However, other participants challenge this notion by highlighting contradictions, such as the inability of undetectable waves to produce observable interference patterns and the implications of detection on wave behavior. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in distinguishing between particles and hypothetical waves.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly the double-slit experiment.
  • Familiarity with wave-particle duality and its implications in physics.
  • Knowledge of Bohmian mechanics and pilot wave theory.
  • Basic grasp of interference patterns in wave physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of wave-particle duality in quantum mechanics.
  • Research Bohmian mechanics and its interpretation of quantum phenomena.
  • Investigate the double-slit experiment and its significance in demonstrating quantum behavior.
  • Examine the role of measurement and detection in quantum systems.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, quantum mechanics enthusiasts, and researchers interested in the foundational concepts of particle behavior and wave interactions in quantum theory.

sadie
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello - I am new to this forum and to much of physics, thank you in advance for your responses - hopefully I won't get beaten up too bad!.

Imagine if fundamental particles somehow floated on waves and when you move a particle you're really generating a wave and the movement of the wave is what moves the particle. Don't ask what the wave is but we'll assume that it is currently or permanently undetectable.

If particles moved that way, I can imagine the two slit experiment as the following:

An electron is accelerated towards the slits. Really it is a wave that is moving toward the slits and the electron is riding on it. The wave goes through both slits but the electron only goes one way or the other. On the other side, the waves interfere and this affects the movement of the electron. If the detector on the other side of the slits were to light up when an electron hits, the electrons would display the interference fringes and we would get the standard picture.

The electron never goes both ways but the wave does. If we had no way of detecting the wave, it would appear as though the electron was interefering with itself.

Thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That makes even less sense. If the electron only goes one way or the other, then the interference pattern that you detect is this mysterious wave itself, not the electron, since the electron didn't have any interference of any kind. This means you've just contradicted yourself by saying this wave can't be detected. (I seriously hope no one will bring up the Bohm pilot wave scenario here unless one is willing to list in detail that this two are the same thing.)

Secondly, try it with small pieces of styrofoam riding on water waves and see if you think the stryrofoam pieces will form the same interference pattern. They will not.

Thirdly, we know what it looks like when the electron goes through one or the other. It doesn't look like the interference pattern.

Lastly, how come this wave knows not to interfere with each other when I put a detector on one of the slits so that I know which way the electron went through? What difference does it make to the undetectable wave since all I'm doing is detecting the electron that, as you said, went through one slit or the other?

You may want to read the PF Guidelines if you missed it the first time around.

Zz.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K