Could gravity's strength also require denisty as an alternative to MOND

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ensabah6
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    mond Strength
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) as an alternative to Dark Matter (DM) theories. It proposes a hypothesis that the strength of gravity may vary with density, being weaker than predicted by General Relativity (GR) at low densities and aligning with GR predictions at higher densities. This concept challenges traditional views on gravitational force and invites further exploration of gravitational behavior under varying density conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND)
  • Familiarity with General Relativity (GR)
  • Basic knowledge of gravitational force and density relationships
  • Concepts of independent research methodologies in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of density variations on gravitational strength
  • Research existing theories that challenge MOND and DM
  • Investigate independent research submission processes in theoretical physics
  • Study the mathematical formulations of gravitational force in low-density environments
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for physicists, cosmologists, and researchers interested in alternative theories of gravity and the nature of dark matter.

ensabah6
Messages
691
Reaction score
0
MOND has been one alternative to DM.

It is based on modifying acceleration of F=MA.

As another alternative, could the strength of the force of gravity be much weaker than expected or predicted by GR when density is low, and as strong as expected by GR when density is above a threshold?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Who knows?

Have you a pet theory you wish to submit to "Independent Research"?

Garth
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K