Could Rapid Spinning Affect Gravity on the Moon?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nution
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Spinning
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the effects of rapid spinning on gravitational forces, particularly in relation to the Moon and Earth. Participants explore theoretical implications of centrifugal force and general relativity, considering how rotation might alter gravity in different contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how the centrifugal force from rapid spinning might affect gravity on the Moon, suggesting it could either weaken, strengthen, or have no effect at all.
  • Another participant notes that gravity is weaker at the equator than at the poles due to Earth's rotation, implying that faster spinning would exaggerate this effect.
  • A mathematical expression for apparent gravity due to Earth's rotation is provided, indicating that gravity is least at the equator and maximum at the poles.
  • Discussion includes the idea that an object's angular motion could lead to a gravitational increase due to energy-mass equivalence, although the practical effects are negligible unless speeds approach that of light.
  • One participant attempts to clarify the concept of centrifugal force by comparing it to driving at high speed around a large circular track, suggesting that the experience of centrifugal force may not be as pronounced as one might think.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the implications of rapid spinning on gravity, with no consensus reached on whether it would weaken, strengthen, or have no effect on gravitational forces. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific effects on the Moon.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the complexity of gravitational effects related to rotation and general relativity, indicating that assumptions about speed and mass-energy relationships may influence their arguments. Some mathematical steps and definitions are not fully explored.

nution
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Of, so the Earth has gravity because of its mass, but what does the effect of the spinning of the Earth cause on gravity. Wouldn't thinking about centrifugal force make you think that the extreme speed we are spinning mixed with how far we are from center have some effect on us out on the edge?

Like for the sake of argument, what if we could somehow force the moon to start spinning rapidly on an axis. What effect if any would that have on the gravitational forces on and around the moon? Would it weaken or strengthen or have no effect at all? It seems to me that rapid spinning would have some effect?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gravity is weaker at the equator than at the poles due to the rotation of the planet. But the Earth doesn't spin fast enough to have a pronounced effect.

If the Earth spun faster the effect would certainly become more exagerated and the effective gravity would certainly reduce further at the equator.

I suggest you have a read through this first:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_of_Earth
At latitudes nearer the equator, the outward centrifugal force produced by Earth's rotation is stronger than at polar latitudes. This counteracts the Earth's gravity to a small degree, reducing downward acceleration of falling objects. At the equator, this apparent gravity is 0.3% less than actual gravity.

It covers everything you are asking here.
 
Last edited:
The apparent acceleration due to gravity due to rotation of the Earth is given by:
g(apparent)= g(standard) - R*ω^2*(cosA)^2
where R is radius of Earth at the point. A is angle made by the latitude with the equator and ω is orbital velocity. So, g is least at equator and max at poles because A=0 at equator and A=90 at poles.
 
Also, in case you are interested, there is an actual (above posts discuss apparent gravity) gravitational increase due to an object's angular motion. The effect is general relativistic, and can be loosely described by saying that to spin an object you have to put energy into it, and energy corresponds to mass, so the object should have more gravity (don't take this simple explanation too far, but hopefully it's enough for you to get a grasp on it). As with most relativistic effects, the impact on our every day life is absolutely negligible, as you would have to be spinning the Earth at speeds comparable to that of light to get noticeable effects.

Of course, there's also the much more complicated phenomenon of frame dragging, which we've been trying to measure for quite some time now. You can read more about it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame-dragging
 
To try and make it more intuitive one can reflect that despite one's 'speed' at the equator, one only completes a single rotation in 24 hours.

Picture driving a car at 100mph around a circular circuit with a circumference of 2400 miles - you're moving fast but you won't experience much 'centrifugal force'...
 
Read "Mission of Gravity", a classic by Hal Clement.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
7K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K