1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Could someone explains what's gone wrong here?

  1. May 25, 2008 #1
    I just read this on another forum

    'We know that the derivative of x^2 with respect to x is 2x. However, what if we rewrite x^2 as the sum of x x's, and then take the derivative:

    d/dx[ x^2 ] = d/dx[ x + x + x + ... (x times) ]
    = d/dx[x] + d/dx[x] + d/dx[x] ... (x times)
    = 1 + 1 + 1 + ... (x times)
    = x

    This argument shows that the derivative of x^2 with respect to x is actually x. So what's going on here?'

    Wheres the mistake? :P
  2. jcsd
  3. May 25, 2008 #2


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    What happens if x is not a positive integer? What if x is negative or a fraction like 1/2? How would it evaluate?

    However, that's not all that's wrong with this argument. Are you familiar with the definition of the derivative? If you are, then take a closer look at the definition to see if this method is still valid under the original fundamental definition.
  4. May 25, 2008 #3


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    The function
    [tex]f(x)= 5x= (5+ 5\c+ 5 \cdot\cdot\cdot+ 5)[itex] {x times}
    is a function of x: your method would say
    [itex]f'(x)= (0+ 0+ 0\cdot\cdot\cdot+ 0)= 0[/itex]
    which is, of course, not true.
    [itex]f(x)= x^2= (x+ x+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ x)[/itex] {x times}

    is a function of x in two ways. You have not taken into account the "x times" part of the function.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?